Aim And Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effect of different resin cements on the bond strength (BS) of custom-made glass fiber posts (GFPs) using the push-out test.

Materials And Methods: Twenty-four uniradicular bovine teeth were selected. The crowns were sectioned at the cementoenamel junction, and the root canals were treated. The post spaces of the teeth were prepared to a length of 12 mm to receive a GFP. The specimens were randomly assigned to three experimental groups ( = 8), according to the resin cement used to fix the GFPs: RelyX U200 (U200), Allcem Core (ACC), and Allcem Dual (ACD). Each specimen was sectioned into six slices per root third (cervical, middle, and apical), which were subjected to the push-out test. BS values were calculated and compared using the Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman tests.

Results: There were significant differences in the middle third, according to the resin cement type used ( < 0.05). ACD showed lower BS values ( < 0.05). Significant differences were observed for ACD among the thirds of the slices, with the lowest values also observed for the middle third ( < 0.05).

Conclusion: The present study shows that ACC and U200 showed higher BS values compared with ACD, and were also less influenced by the depth of the root dentin.

Clinical Significance: The restoration of endodontically treated teeth is a challenge in dentistry, and, in most cases, will require installation of fiberglass pins. In this respect, several types of resin cements are indicated for cementation of these pins; for this reason, their adhesiveness must be adequately investigated. Conventional cements and self-adhesive cements have shown satisfactory performance in cementing the custom-made GFPs, thereby making these cements satisfactory clinical choices. The present study suggests that ACD had lower performance than the other two cements evaluated.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

resin cements
12
cements bond
8
bond strength
8
strength custom-made
8
glass fiber
8
resin cement
8
middle third
8
acd lower
8
cements satisfactory
8
cements
6

Similar Publications

Objectives: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of universal cements (UCs) to dentin prepared with different diamond burs using various adhesive strategies.

Materials And Methods: One-hundred-twenty molars were prepared to expose the mid-coronal dentin. The teeth were divided into two groups according to diamond bur preparations: coarse and super-fine grit burs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This randomized controlled trial compared the 1-year clinical efficacy of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive Plus (SBU+) with that of its predecessor Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SBU) to restore Class I and Class II preparations using the self-etch strategy in adult patients.

Materials And Methods: Fifty-one subjects participated in this study. Two posterior teeth in each subject were randomized to a restoration with SBU+ or to a restoration with SBU (control) using the self-etch strategy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Shear bond strength and ARI scores of metal brackets to glazed glass ceramics and zirconia: an in vitro study investigating surface treatment protocols.

BMC Oral Health

December 2024

Faculty of Dentistry, Innovative Dental Materials and Interfaces Research Unit (URB2i), UR 4462, Paris Cité University, 1 rue Maurice Arnoux, Montrouge, 92120, France.

Objective: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores of metal brackets to glazed lithium disilicate reinforced glass-ceramics and zirconia according to various surface treatment protocols.

Methods: A total of 240 lithium disilicate ceramic (LD) and 240 zirconia (Zr) blocks were randomly divided according to sandblasting, hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching, universal primer use, and the adhesive system applied. A maxillary canine metal bracket was bonded to each sample with resin cement (Transbond XT, TXT).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives This study aimed to compare the shear bond strength of three resin cements (light-cured resin cement, pre-heated composite resin, and dual-cured self-adhesive resin cement) when bonding to lithium disilicate discs. Materials and methods Thirty-six discs made of lithium disilicate were fabricated and etched with 9.5% (HF), and 36 human premolars were collected and immersed in the acrylic molds, then randomly divided into three equal groups (n = 12): Group 1: light-cured resin cement, Group 2: pre-heated resin composite, and Group 3: dual-cured resin cement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Trends in pH-triggered strategies for dental resins aiming to assist in preventing demineralization: A scoping review.

J Dent

December 2024

Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 325, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-617, Brazil. Electronic address:

Objectives: To identify and map the literature on the current state of pH-triggered strategies for resin-based materials used in direct restorative dentistry, focusing on innovative compounds, their incorporation and evaluation methods, and the main outcomes.

Data And Sources: Through a search across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, LILACS, Cochrane Library databases, and Google Scholar, this review identified studies pertinent to pH-responsive dental materials, excluding resin-modified glass ionomer cements.

Study Selection: From the 981 records identified, 19 in vitro studies were included, concentrating on resin-based composite resins (50 %), dentin adhesives (25 %), and sealants (25 %).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!