AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to identify predictive factors of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) failure in critically ill COVID-19 patients that go beyond respiratory status and acid-base balance analysis.
  • Out of 73 patients analyzed, 54 (about 74%) experienced NIV failure, with identified factors including the presence of dyspnoea at admission, higher lung edema scores on chest X-rays, longer duration of NIV, and elevated urea levels on the day NIV started.
  • The findings highlight that these predictors, alongside respiratory metrics, are essential for treatment decisions regarding NIV in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Article Abstract

Aim To identify predictive factors related with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) failure that are not based on the patient's respiratory status or acid base gas analyses in COVID-19 critically ill patients, and to create a predictive model of NIV failure. Methods A total of 73 COVID-19 critically ill patients who developed acute respiratory failure and underwent NIV were divided into two groups: Group 1, patients who required endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation after NIV and Group 2, patients with successful weaning from NIV. Demographic data, clinical symptoms and signs, clinical index and scores, duration indicators and laboratory data were analysed. Predictive factors of NIV failure were assessed using univariate and multivariate regression analyses followed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results In the Group 1 (NIV failure) there were 54 (73.97%) patients. Predictive factors for NIV failure were: the presence of dyspnoea on the day of admission at hospital (p<0.05; sensitivity 44.40%; specificity 84.20%), higher radiographic assessment of lung oedema score (RALES) on the day of starting NIV (p<0.009; sensitivity 70.40%; specificity 73.75%), higher length of NIV (p<0.014; sensitivity 48%; specificity 84.10%) and higher urea on the day of starting NIV (p<0.004; sensitivity 70.44%; specificity 73.72%) Conclusion NIV treatment in COVID-19 critically ill patients has a high failure rate. In addition to respiratory parameters, dyspnoea, higher RALES, higher length of NIV and increased urea value could predict NIV failure. These factors should be considered in treatment decision making.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.17392/1385-21DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

niv failure
20
predictive factors
16
covid-19 critically
12
critically ill
12
ill patients
12
factors noninvasive
8
mechanical ventilation
8
niv
8
ventilation niv
8
group patients
8

Similar Publications

The use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in patients with advanced cystic fibrosis (CF) has increased in recent years. Research evidence supports its clinical benefits, but less is known about the patients' experience of its long-term use in a domiciliary setting. To investigate patients' lived experience of using long-term domiciliary NIV.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Constraints to the initiation of home non-invasive ventilation and short-term efficacy in different diagnostic groups (as a prelude to an ambulatory shift).

Respir Med Res

January 2025

Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Angers University hospital, Angers, France; MitoVasc, Carme, SFR ICAT, CNRS 6015, Inserm 1083, University of Angers, Angers, France. Electronic address:

Introduction: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is the reference treatment for chronic respiratory failure (CRF) due to impairment of the ventilatory system. Home initiation is increasingly practiced. To better support this ambulatory shift, we aimed to assess the implementation constraints and short-term efficacy according to different aetiologies of CRF.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study aimed to identify risk factors for noninvasive ventilation (NIV) failure in <30 weeks' gestation preterm neonates and compare morbidity in patients with and without NIV failure. This study included preterm neonates <30 weeks' gestation who received NIV support for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between infants with and without NIV failure within the first 72 hours after birth.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: We aimed to determine predictors of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) failure and validate a nomogram to identify patients at risk of NIV failure.

Design: Observational, analytical study of a retrospective cohort from a single center, compared with an external cohort (March 2020 to August 2021).

Setting: Two intensive care units (ICUs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recently, there has been growing interest in knowing the best hygrometry level during high-flow nasal oxygen and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and its potential influence on the outcome. Various studies have shown that breathing cold and dry air results in excessive water loss by nasal mucosa, reduced mucociliary clearance, increased airway resistance, reduced epithelial cell function, increased inflammation, sloughing of tracheal epithelium, and submucosal inflammation. With the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic, using high-flow nasal oxygen with a heated humidifier has become an emerging form of non-invasive support among clinicians.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!