AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to differentiate between new lung cancer and pulmonary metastases in patients, identifying clinical variables that could aid in this distinction and guide surgical management.
  • A total of 55 cases were analyzed, revealing that larger lesion sizes, longer disease-free intervals, older patient age, and higher SUV-max values were more prevalent in those with new lung cancer compared to those with pulmonary metastases.
  • The findings highlight the importance of continuous monitoring for new lung cancer, especially in patients with a history of head and neck cancers, indicating a need for further diagnostic procedures like cervical mediastinoscopy in ambiguous cases.

Article Abstract

Background: In our study, since the operative histopathological distinction of new malignant pulmonary lesions as either a primary lung cancer or a pulmonary metastasis is difficult, we aimed to identify the clinical variables which might allow distinction between a new lung cancer and a pulmonary metastasis, and the appropriate surgical management.

Methods: We divided 55 cases into two groups: patients with new lung cancer (NLC, n = 32) and patients with pulmonary metastases (PM, n = 23). Based on the primary organ, the previous malignancy was classified into four categories: head and neck, colorectal, genitourinary, and breast cancer. The parameters included in the study were age, sex, smoking history, a family history of cancer, disease-free interval, primary organ, treatments for previous malignancies, size, and SUV max of the lung lesion on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan and high-resolution computed tomography findings of the lung lesion.

Results: A predisposition for larger lesions was found in the NLC group. In addition, in the NLC group, disease-free interval was noted to be longer, patients were significantly older and SUV-max values of solitary pulmonary lesions were significantly higher than in the PM group. Pulmonary lesions in patients with prior head and neck cancers were more likely to develop NLC. No significant difference in statistical analysis was observed between the groups in terms of sex, smoking, a family history of cancer, a history of adjuvant therapy, radiological pulmonary lesions signs, and localization.

Conclusion: PL monitoring on CT surveillance is essential, particularly in patients with previous head and neck cancers, who appear to have a higher risk for NLC. If pathological MLN accompanies PL in a patient with previous extrapulmonary malignancy, cervical mediastinoscopy may help acquire a possible PL diagnosis besides mediastinal staging. Intraoperative frozen section may have difficulty in distinguishing between PM and NLC when the lesion is of the same histological type as the previous malignancy. When precise distinction cannot be achieved by frozen section, we speculate that DFI, age, and radiological findings of the PL may help thoracic surgeons take initiative peroperatively while designating the subsequent surgical intervention. Lastly, pulmonary segmentectomy is also better be considered along with lobectomy in NLC cases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.17045DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pulmonary lesions
20
lung cancer
12
head neck
12
pulmonary
9
malignant pulmonary
8
previous extrapulmonary
8
extrapulmonary malignancy
8
cancer pulmonary
8
pulmonary metastasis
8
primary organ
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!