Efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis.

JRSM Open

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029 China.

Published: June 2021

Objective: Several trials had compared the efficacy and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin for acute venous thromboembolism, but the results were incomplete. This updated review comprehensively assessed the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism.

Design: Meta-analysis of randomised control trials. Six databases were searched from January 2000 to December 2018.

Setting: Adult patients had got non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants or warfarin for venous thromboembolism.

Participants: Randomised control trials that compared the efficacy and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin.

Main Outcome Measures: The efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants .

Results: Seven studies involving 29,879 cases were included, among which 14,943 cases were assigned to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group and 14,936 cases to warfarin group. Meta-analysis showed that compared with warfarin, recurrent venous thromboembolism (odds ratio 0.94 [95% confidence interval 0.81 to 1.11]), death related to venous thromboembolism or fatal pulmonary embolism (odds ratio 1.00 [95% confidence interval 0.63 to 1.60]), symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (odds ratio 0.88 [95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.09]), symptomatic nonfatal pulmonary embolism (odds ratio 1.03 [(95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.30]) and all deaths (odds ratio 0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.12]) are similar in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group, but major bleeding event (odds ratio 0.61 [95% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.75]) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding event (odds ratio [95% confidence interval 0.53 to 0.85]) are less in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group. .

Conclusions: For the treatment of venous thromboembolism, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants is as effective as warfarin, and has a better safety profile than warfarin.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207293PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20542704211010686DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-vitamin antagonist
40
antagonist oral
40
oral anticoagulants
40
odds ratio
28
[95% confidence
28
confidence interval
28
efficacy safety
20
safety non-vitamin
20
venous thromboembolism
20
non-vitamin
10

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!