Background: Surgical counting is a complex and safety-critical task that requires sustained attention by multiple members of the surgical team in order to prevent the occurrence of an unintentionally retained foreign object. Interruptions and distractions in the operating room are common and can negatively affect task performance. However, the prevalence and sources of interruptions and distractions during safety-critical tasks, such as surgical counting, have not previously been quantified. An understanding of the characteristics of these events could be used to inform targeted improvements to patient safety.

Methods: Observations were conducted of surgical procedures in order to quantify and describe interruptions and distractions during surgical counting activities. Analysis was separated into phases: the initial count, additions to the surgical field, removals from the surgical field, and closure counts.

Results: Thirty-six surgical procedures were observed. Interruptions occurred in 10.0% of initial counts, 15.4% of additions, 23.5% of removals, and 33.3% of closure counts observed. The source of 80.4% of interruptions was a surgeon, usually asking the scrub nurse for an item. Distractions were present in 46.7% of initial counts, 38.5% of additions, 41.2% of removals, and 40.9% of closure counts observed. Common sources of distraction included music, conversations, people entering and exiting the theater, and ringing phones.

Conclusion: Interruptions and distractions are common during surgical counts and can significantly affect patient safety by jeopardizing the accuracy of the count. A number of suggestions are provided that could reduce interruptions and distractions and their consequences.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.05.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interruptions distractions
24
surgical counting
12
surgical
10
interruptions
8
distractions surgical
8
surgical counts
8
surgical procedures
8
surgical field
8
initial counts
8
closure counts
8

Similar Publications

Background The dental faculty must understand the challenges students face in prosthodontics to enhance education and meet patient care demands. This study explored final-year Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) students' perceptions, study methods, and clinical application of knowledge, identifying gaps in translating theory to practice, skill acquisition, and curriculum alignment. Insights guide improvements in mentorship, hands-on training, and active learning to enhance clinical preparedness.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study in Jordan found a 2.4% prevalence of vaccine administration errors (VAEs) during the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, with various types of errors identified, including timing and dosing mistakes.
  • Most errors were minor or moderate, and significant contributing factors included healthcare provider issues and higher error rates during peak vaccination times and in the Southern region.
  • The findings highlight the need for more research and strategies to address VAEs to ensure effective immunization and patient safety.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: To map studies that tested an intervention orienting patient transfer to Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and identify outcomes related to care safety.

Methods: Scoping review guided by recommendations of the JBI Manual and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guide. The Population, Concept, and Context (PCC) framework was used to develop the research question and consolidate inclusion and exclusion criteria in databases consulted without date parameters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This research examined the network properties (network graph, centrality, and edge weights) of the 18 ADHD symptoms, based on the self-ratings of 300 adolescents. The findings indicated the three symptoms with the highest centrality values were "inattention", "wait", and "interrupt". For edge weights, there were positive large effect size associations for "lose" with "forgetful", "fidget with "run", "blurt" with "wait", and "wait" with "interrupt"; and positive moderate effect size associations for "careless" with "instruction", and "avoid" with "listen".

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unhurried conversations are necessary for careful and kind care that is responsive and responsible to both patients and clinicians. Adequate conceptual development is an important first step in being able to assess and measure this important domain of quality of care. In this article, we expand on a preliminary model to identify the key microlevel communication practices that support an unhurried conversation, defined as an ongoing, mutual accomplishment between patient and clinician that proceeds through a range of verbal and nonverbal communication practices wherein one or more participants (mutually) regulate the sequence, spacing (temporal and spatial), and speed of interaction to make themselves available to the other and remove or suspend distractions from the environment in order to improve care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!