Postoperative imaging follow-up at 2 years as a predictor of long-term outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair.

J Vasc Surg

Centre for Vascular Surgery and Interventional Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, and Tampere University, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Tampere, Finland.

Published: December 2021

Objective: Lifelong imaging follow-up remains the reference standard after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Because the number of EVARs has been increasing, an individually optimized follow-up protocol is desirable. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possibility of creating such a protocol by evaluating patients' follow-up images and to compare the findings with their freedom from reintervention and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture.

Methods: From 2000 to 2010, 282 patients with an AAA had undergone elective EVAR with the Zenith stent-graft. The patients were followed up annually until the end of 2019. The patients were categorized into two groups according to the presence of any endoleak or sac shrinkage at 2 years. Group A included those with no detectable endoleak plus aneurysm sac shrinkage of ≥5 mm (n = 137; 63%), and group B included those with any type of endoleak and/or no significant aneurysm sac shrinkage (<5 mm; n = 82; 37%).

Results: The mean follow-up was 83 months (range, 0-229 months), and the overall survival at 2 years was 84% (n = 237). No significant difference was found in overall survival between groups A and B (P = .73). However, a significant difference was found in freedom from AAA rupture at 12 years, favoring group A (group A, 100%; group B, 91%; P = .002). Furthermore, in group A, the freedom from reintervention was 95% at 12 years compared with only 31% in group B (P < .001). The sensitivity of the categorization was 89% and the specificity was 74% for the finding of a complication requiring a reintervention during long-term follow-up.

Conclusions: Patients without an endoleak and a reduction of ≥5 mm in aneurysm size at 2 years had significantly fewer late reinterventions and ruptures during long-term follow-up compared with their counterparts using the Zenith stent-graft (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind). This finding suggests that, for these patients, the follow-up interval can be personalized and safely extended after 2 years.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2021.05.044DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sac shrinkage
12
imaging follow-up
8
endovascular aneurysm
8
aneurysm repair
8
group included
8
aneurysm sac
8
aneurysm
5
postoperative imaging
4
follow-up
4
follow-up 2 years
4

Similar Publications

: To study the influence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and metformin treatment on aneurysm sac remodeling after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). : A retrospective single-center cohort analysis was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent elective EVAR for an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) between January 2011 and December 2021. Differences between study groups were analyzed and Kaplan-Meier analysis were employed to describe overall and reintervention-free survival.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: A simple risk stratification model to predict aneurysm sac shrinkagein patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) was developed using machine learning-based decision tree analysis.

Methods: One hundred nineteen patients with AAA who underwent elective EVAR at Tokyo Medical University Hospital between November 2013 and July 2019 were included in the study. Predictors of aneurysm sac shrinkage identified in univariable analysis (P < 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Arterial stiffening is associated with adverse cardiovascular patient outcomes; stiffness may also be associated with postsurgical events and has been suggested to be a fundamental mechanism in the pathogenesis of aortic aneurysms. Although open repair of aneurysms decreases aortic stiffness, implantation of a rigid endograft is associated with increased aortic stiffness after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). This review provides an overview of aortic wall physiology and the contemporary understanding of aortic stiffness and its implications for patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aortic aneurysm management results through one year with a conformable neck sealing endograft and preemptive sac embolization with shape memory polymer devices.

J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech

February 2025

Department of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Fairfax.

Management of abdominal aortic aneurysm includes reducing the incidence of endoleaks and promoting sac regression. Sac embolization has been shown to promote regression but alone may not adequately address type II endoleak risk. We present three cases with challenging anatomy and follow-up data through 12 months after treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Fenestrated endografts have been a safe and effective solution in our institution for patients with juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) that were not candidates for conventional repair and had suitable anatomy. The objective of our study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of these interventions.

Methods: Between September 2005 and December 2021, this study included all the patients bearing juxtarenal aneurysm electively treated with a fenestrated endograft.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!