A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Validation of the Reflux Disease Questionnaire for a Turkish Population. | LitMetric

Validation of the Reflux Disease Questionnaire for a Turkish Population.

J Gastrointestin Liver Dis

Department of Gastroenterology, Ege University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.

Published: June 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study emphasizes the importance of valid patient-reported questionnaires for diagnosing and treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), particularly focusing on the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ).
  • The research involved 81 GERD patients and assessed the RDQ’s psychometric properties including validity and reliability through various statistical methods.
  • Results showed that the RDQ TR is both reliable and valid for Turkish patients, with strong internal consistency and a high correlation coefficient, indicating its effectiveness in evaluating GERD symptoms.

Article Abstract

Background And Aims: Achieving the correct diagnosis and therapeutic success in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) depends on the patient's self-assessment. Therefore, valid and reliable patient-reported questionnaires are very important. When designing such measurement tools, researchers should focus on their validity, reliability, sensitivity, and, applicability. The reflux disease questionnaire (RDQ) largely meets these important requirements. This study aims to examine The RDQ's psychometric characteristics for the Turkish society (RDQ TR ) and its validity in symptoms' evaluation.

Methods: The sample of this study comprised 81 patients who were admitted to our institution, GERD study group outpatient clinic. The data collection forms used in the study were the case report forms and RDQ. Three weeks after the first interview, 30 patients were re-interviewed by the phone and the RDQ was re-administered. For the validity studies of the scale, language validity, content validity, and construct validity studies were used, and for the reliability studies, internal consistency and test-retest reliability methods were used.

Results: The content validity index of form was 0.95 (0.93-0.98). The performed factor analysis indicated 3 factors with an eigenvalue over 1.0. Those factors were responsible for 77.66% of the variance. The Cronbach's alpha values were 0.88 for regurgitation sub-dimension, 0.91 for dyspepsia sub-dimension, 0.86 for heartburn sub-dimension, and 0.92 overall. Intraclass correlation coefficient value of the scale was 0.94.

Conclusions: Our study highlights that the RDQ TR is reliable, valid, and responsive to change in Turkey patients with GERD symptomatology.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.15403/jgld-3309DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reflux disease
12
disease questionnaire
8
validity studies
8
content validity
8
validity
7
rdq
5
study
5
validation reflux
4
questionnaire turkish
4
turkish population
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!