An upper bound visualization of design trade-offs in adsorbent materials for gas separations: alkene/alkane adsorbents.

Chem Commun (Camb)

MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.

Published: July 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • There's been a surge in research on porous solids for gas adsorption and separation over the past 20 years, driven by climate change and the discovery of new materials like zeolites and metal-organic frameworks.
  • Current literature lacks a visual comparison tool for these materials' properties, which hampers scientific advancement and industrial application.
  • This article introduces upper and lower bound visualizations to illustrate trade-offs in adsorbent design, specifically for gas separation, and offers a database resource for researchers to create and share these comparative plots, enhancing both material discovery and practical application.

Article Abstract

The last 20 years has seen an explosion in the number of publications investigating porous solids for gas adsorption and separation. The combination of external drivers such as anthropogenic climate change and industrial efficiency has been coupled with discovery of new materials such as synthetic zeolites, metal-organic frameworks, covalent organic frameworks, and non-porous adsorbents. Numerous reviews catalogue these materials and their properties. However, the field lacks a unifying resource to visually compare and analyse materials properties with regard to their utility as a scientific advance and potential for industrial use. In the related field of membrane science, the 'Robeson upper bound' empirically describes the trade-off between gas permeability and selectivity and has become a ubiquitous tool for comparing membrane materials. In this article, we propose upper and lower bounds that empirically correlate the trade-offs encountered when designing adsorbent materials for gas separation, specifically: capacity, selectivity, and heat of adsorption. We apply bound visualizations to adsorbents studied for light alkene/alkane separations and highlight their use in identifying candidate materials for examination within process models and for guiding insights to the most effective materials design strategies. Furthermore, we note the limitations of upper and lower bound visualizations and provide links to a database resource for researchers to produce and download bound visualization plots. We anticipate that introducing bound visualizations to the field of adsorbents for gas separations will allow researchers to provide context for the importance of new materials discoveries, understand trade-offs in adsorbent design, and connect process engineers with candidate materials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1cc02350kDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bound visualizations
12
materials
10
bound visualization
8
trade-offs adsorbent
8
adsorbent materials
8
materials gas
8
gas separations
8
materials properties
8
upper lower
8
candidate materials
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!