Purpose: To advance fair and consistent comparisons of dose prediction methods for knowledge-based planning (KBP) in radiation therapy research.
Methods: We hosted OpenKBP, a 2020 AAPM Grand Challenge, and challenged participants to develop the best method for predicting the dose of contoured computed tomography (CT) images. The models were evaluated according to two separate scores: (a) dose score, which evaluates the full three-dimensional (3D) dose distributions, and (b) dose-volume histogram (DVH) score, which evaluates a set DVH metrics. We used these scores to quantify the quality of the models based on their out-of-sample predictions. To develop and test their models, participants were given the data of 340 patients who were treated for head-and-neck cancer with radiation therapy. The data were partitioned into training ( ), validation ( ), and testing ( ) datasets. All participants performed training and validation with the corresponding datasets during the first (validation) phase of the Challenge. In the second (testing) phase, the participants used their model on the testing data to quantify the out-of-sample performance, which was hidden from participants and used to determine the final competition ranking. Participants also responded to a survey to summarize their models.
Results: The Challenge attracted 195 participants from 28 countries, and 73 of those participants formed 44 teams in the validation phase, which received a total of 1750 submissions. The testing phase garnered submissions from 28 of those teams, which represents 28 unique prediction methods. On average, over the course of the validation phase, participants improved the dose and DVH scores of their models by a factor of 2.7 and 5.7, respectively. In the testing phase one model achieved the best dose score (2.429) and DVH score (1.478), which were both significantly better than the dose score (2.564) and the DVH score (1.529) that was achieved by the runner-up models. Lastly, many of the top performing teams reported that they used generalizable techniques (e.g., ensembles) to achieve higher performance than their competition.
Conclusion: OpenKBP is the first competition for knowledge-based planning research. The Challenge helped launch the first platform that enables researchers to compare KBP prediction methods fairly and consistently using a large open-source dataset and standardized metrics. OpenKBP has also democratized KBP research by making it accessible to everyone, which should help accelerate the progress of KBP research. The OpenKBP datasets are available publicly to help benchmark future KBP research.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14845 | DOI Listing |
Radiother Oncol
December 2024
Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. Electronic address:
Background And Purpose: Knowledge-based planning (KBP) can consistently and efficiently create high-quality Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans for cervix cancer. This study describes the cross-validation of two KBP models on geographically distinct populations and their comparison to manual plans from 67 centers. The purpose was to determine the universal applicability of a generic KBP model.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPhys Eng Sci Med
December 2024
Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, 377-2 Onohigashi, Osakasayama-shi, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
This study examined the characteristics of the broad model (KBP) through a complete open-loop evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for prostate cancer in 30 patients at two institutions. KBP, trained using 561 prostate cancer VMAT plans from five institutions with different treatment protocols, was shared with two institutions. The institutions were not involved in the creation of KBP.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Med Insights Oncol
December 2024
Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
The promise of novel technologies to increase access to radiotherapy in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is crucial, given that the cost of equipping new radiotherapy centres or upgrading existing machinery remains a major obstacle to expanding access to cancer treatment. The study aims to provide a thorough analysis overview of how technological advancement may revolutionize radiotherapy (RT) to improve level of care provided to cancer patients. A comprehensive literature review following some steps of systematic review (SLR) was performed using the Web of Science (WoS), PubMed, and Scopus databases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMed Dosim
December 2024
Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Multispeciality Hospitals, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
This article aims to compare the dosimetric performance between knowledge-based plan (KBP) libraries with and without trade-off (TO) exploration using multicriterial optimization (MCO) for tongue cancer patients. The trade-off optimized library (KBP_MCO) contains a minimal number of constituent plans, whereas two nontrade-off optimized libraries contain a minimal and a large number of treatment plans, respectively. Three KBP libraries were created: KBP_100 and KBP_20, each comprising of 100 and 20 manually optimized plans, respectively.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBrachytherapy
December 2024
Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA. Electronic address:
Purpose: The bladder and rectal toxicities in cervical cancer brachytherapy are positively correlated with the DVH parameter: D2cc. This study evaluates the feasibility of knowledge-based planning to predict the D2cc, identify suboptimal plans, and improve the plan quality with Direction Modulated Brachytherapy (DMBT) applicators using knowledge-based planning based on linear relationship between overlap distances and D2cc.
Methods: The overlap volume histogram (OVH) method was used to determine the distances for 2 cm of overlap between the Organs at Risks (OAR) and High-Risk Clinical Target Volume (CTV).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!