Background And Purpose: Whether tirofiban is safe and effective in cardioembolic stroke patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) remains unknown; this study evaluated the safety and efficacy of low-dose tirofiban in this patients population.

Methods: This study was a prospective registry study. Patients with cardioembolic stroke undergoing EVT from January 2013 to December 2020 were treated with EVT alone or EVT plus low-dose tirofiban. The primary outcome was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) prior to discharge. The secondary outcomes included reocclusion, in-hospital mortality, and 3-month functional outcomes.

Results: Overall, 288 patients were recruited and 117 received low-dose tirofiban; 137 patients (47.6%) experienced ICH, 42 patients (14.6%) were sICH, and 23 patients (8%) were fatal ICH. Thirteen patients (11.1%) receiving tirofiban and 29 patients (17.0%) not receiving tirofiban experienced sICH (p = 0.167). Reocclusion occurred in nine patients (7.7%) receiving tirofiban and 15 patients (8.8%) not receiving tirofiban (p = 0.745). The rates of hernia (6.8% versus 20.5%) and decompressive craniectomy (2.6% versus 11.7%) were significantly lower in patients receiving tirofiban (p < 0.01). At 3-month follow-up, functional independence was achieved in 39 patients(33.3%) receiving tirofiban and 43 patients (25.1%) not receiving tirofiban (p = 0.131). Tirofiban was associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality (3.4% versus 12.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.81; adjusted p = 0.027).

Conclusions: In patients with cardioembolic stroke undergoing EVT, tirofiban is not associated with higher sICH, it seems to lead to lower odds of in-hospital death. Further investigations are needed to confirm these results and to determine the optimal treatment protocols of tirofiban.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2021.117539DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

receiving tirofiban
20
low-dose tirofiban
16
patients
13
cardioembolic stroke
12
tirofiban patients
12
tirofiban
9
in-hospital mortality
8
stroke patients
8
patients treated
8
treated endovascular
8

Similar Publications

Background: This study assessed caliber and flow changes of covered cortical middle cerebral artery (MCA) branches using the new Caliber-Flow Status Scale (CFSS), postoperative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesions, and clinical outcome following flow diverter (FD) treatment of MCA aneurysms.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study collected data from patients treated with FD between January 2016 and March 2024, including patient characteristics, aneurysm features, postoperative DWI lesions, and clinical outcomes. Vessel status was assessed using CFSS: 1a (normal caliber and flow), 1b (normal caliber, reduced flow), 2a (reduced caliber, normal flow), 2b (reduced caliber and flow), and 3 (occlusion).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objectives: Despite achieving ideal reperfusion (eTICI = 3) through endovascular treatment (EVT), some acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients still experience poor outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in AIS patients with ideal reperfusion, focusing on its effects in large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) and cardioembolic (CE) stroke.

Methods: A total of 474 AIS patients from the RESCUE-BT database were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This research aimed to ascertain the effects of tirofiban combined with thrombus aspiration and stent thrombectomy on large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke (LVO-IS).

Methods: Sixty patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by LVO were randomized into the control group and the intervention group (n=30). Patients in the control group received thrombus aspiration combined with stent thrombectomy, while those in the intervention group were treated with tirofiban combined with thrombus aspiration and stent thrombectomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Tirofiban is administered for the treatment of aneurysms in cases of thromboembolic complications, as well as in cases of acute stenting or flow-diverter implantation required within the scope of aneurysm treatment. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in this group of patients.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing aneurysm treatment and receiving peri-interventional tirofiban administration at our institution between 2009 and 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Values of H-Type Hypertension in Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion.

Clin Interv Aging

November 2024

Department of Neurology, Xinqiao Hospital and The Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, People's Republic of China.

Background And Purpose: Many patients who gained successful recanalization by endovascular treatment (EVT) with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) did not have the favorable outcome. The study aimed to assess the association between H-type hypertension and clinical prognosis in patients with LVO after receiving EVT.

Methods: Our study enrolled patients from the Endovascular Treatment With versus Without Tirofiban for Stroke Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion (RESCUE BT) Trial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!