Household sampling through geocoded points and satellite view: A step-by-step approach to implement a spatial sampling method for demographic and health surveys in areas without population sampling frame and with limited resource settings.

Introduction: Spatial sampling is increasingly used in health surveys as it provides a simple way to randomly select target populations on sites where reliable and complete data on the general population are not available. However, the previously implemented protocols have been poorly detailed, making replication difficult or even impossible. To our knowledge, ours is the first document describing step-by-step an efficient spatial sampling method for health surveys. Our objective is to facilitate the rapid acquisition of the technical skills and know-how necessary for its deployment.

Methods: The spatial sampling design is based on the random generation of geocoded points in the study area. Afterwards, these points were projected on the satellite view of Google Earth Pro™ software and the identified buildings were selected for field visits. A detailed formula of the number of points required, considering non-responses, is proposed. Density of buildings was determined by drawing circles around points and by using a replacement strategy when interviewing was unachievable. The method was implemented for a cross-sectional study during the April-May 2016 period in Cotonou (Bénin). The accuracy of the collected data was assessed by comparing them to those of the Cotonou national census.

Result: This approach does not require prior displacement in the study area and only 1% of identified buildings with Google Earth Pro™ were no longer extant. Most of the measurements resulting from the general census were within the confidence intervals of those calculated with the sample data. Furthermore, the range of measurements resulting from the general census was similar to those calculated with the sample data. These include, for example, the proportion of the foreign population (unweighted 8.9%/weighted 9% versus 8.5% in census data), the proportion of adults over 17 years of age (56.7% versus 57% in census data), the proportion of households whose head is not educated (unweighted 21.9%/weighted 22.8% versus 21.1% in census data).

Conclusion: This article illustrates how an epidemiological field survey based on spatial sampling can be successfully implemented at low cost, quickly and with little technical and theoretical knowledge. While statistically similar to simple random sampling, this survey method greatly simplifies its implementation.