Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Electrocortical stimulation mapping (ESM) is often performed in patients undergoing stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) prior to epilepsy surgery, with the goal of identifying functional cortex and preserving it postoperatively. ESM may also evoke a patient's typical seizure semiology. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the sites at which typical auras are evoked during ESM are associated with other known clinical and electrophysiologic biomarkers of the epileptogenic zone: the seizure onset zone (SOZ), the early spread zone (ES), and high-frequency oscillations (HFOs). We found that the sites at which auras were provoked were not consistently associated with known biomarkers (p = 0.09). We conclude that evoked auras during ESM may reflect electrical spread rather than true epileptogenicity, and that a larger study is needed to assess their potential value as independent epileptic biomarkers.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108116 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!