AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to determine if various oxygenation indices could predict mortality in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients suffering from acute respiratory failure.
  • Researchers evaluated 68 critically ill adult patients, measuring key physiological parameters on the day of intubation and on days 3 and 7 post-intubation.
  • Results showed that while baseline indices did not differ between survivors and non-survivors on the day of intubation, significant differences emerged by day 3 and day 7, indicating worse oxygenation in non-surviving patients.

Article Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory failure from COVID-19 pneumonia is a major cause of death after SARS-CoV-2 infection. We investigated whether PaO/FiO, oxygenation index (OI), SpO/FiO, and oxygen saturation index (OSI), commonly used to assess the severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), can predict mortality in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients.

Methods: In this single-centered retrospective pilot study, we enrolled 68 critically ill mechanically ventilated adult patients with confirmed COVID-19. Physiological variables were recorded on the day of intubation (day 0) and postintubation days 3 and 7. The association between physiological parameters, PaO/FiO, OI, SpO/FiO, and OSI with mortality was assessed using multiple variable logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of the predictive models.

Results: The ARDS severity indices were not statistically different on the day of intubation, suggesting similar baseline conditions in nonsurviving and surviving patients. However, these indices were significantly worse in the nonsurviving as compared to surviving patients on postintubation days 3 and 7. On intubation day 3, PaO/FiO was 101.0 (61.4) in nonsurviving patients vs. 140.2 (109.6) in surviving patients, =0.004, and on day 7 106.3 (94.2) vs. 178.0 (69.3), < 0.001. OI was 135.0 (129.7) in nonsurviving vs. 84.8 (86.1) in surviving patients (=0.003) on day 3 and 150.0 (118.4) vs. 61.5 (46.7) ( < 0.001) on day 7. OSI was 12.0 (11.7) vs. 8.0 (10.0) (=0.006) on day 3 and 14.7 (13.2) vs. 6.5 (5.4) ( < 0.001) on day 7. Similarly, SpO/FiO was 130 (90) vs. 210 (90) (=0.003) on day 3 and 130 (90) vs. 230 (50) ( < 0.001) on day 7, while OSI was 12.0 (11.7) vs. 8.0 (10.0) (=0.006) on day 3 and 14.7 (13.2) vs. 6.5 (5.4) ( < 0.001) on day 7 in the nonsurviving and surviving patients, respectively. All measures were independently associated with hospital mortality, with significantly greater odds ratios observed on day 7. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for mortality prediction was greatest on intubation day 7 (AUC = 0.775, 0.808, and 0.828 for PaO/FiO, OI, SpO/FiO, and OSI, respectively).

Conclusions: Decline in oxygenation indices after intubation is predictive of mortality in COVID-19 patients. This time window is critical to the outcome of these patients and a possible target for future interventions. Future large-scale studies to confirm the prognostic value of the indices in COVID-19 patients are warranted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8162249PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6682944DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surviving patients
20
0001 day
16
day
15
intubation day
12
patients
10
oxygen saturation
8
mortality covid-19
8
retrospective pilot
8
pilot study
8
acute respiratory
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!