A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Electrofulguration-assisted dermabrasion is comparable to manual dermabrasion in patients undergoing autologous non-cultured epidermal cell suspension for treatment of stable vitiligo: A randomized controlled trial. | LitMetric

Background: Recipient site preparation is a crucial step in non-cultured epidermal cell suspension (NCES) as it facilitates proper uptake of the grafted melanocytes.

Objectives: To compare the repigmentation rate of recipient sites prepared with manual dermabrasion (MD) versus electrofulguration-assisted dermabrasion (EF) in patients undergoing NCES for treatment of stable vitiligo.

Methods: This was a prospective randomized study including 26 patients of stable vitiligo (VIDA 0 or -1), each having two patches of size greater than 3 × 3 cm located symmetrically or at the same site or a single patch of 6 × 6 cm or larger. After randomization of patches in the given patient, MD and EF were performed on recipient areas followed by NCES. The patients were followed up at 4 weekly intervals up to 24 weeks and assessed for extent of repigmentation and adverse effects if any.

Results: Greater than 75% repigmentation was observed in 69.3% of the patches prepared by MD as compared to 73.1% patches prepared by EF at the end of 24 weeks (p = 0.791). The mean improvement in target VASI was 64.0% in the MD group as compared to 68.8% in the EF group (p = 0.21). Patches prepared by EF achieved successful repigmentation earlier as compared to patches prepared by MD (9.4 weeks vs 11.4 weeks, p = 0.12).

Conclusion: Both MD and EF have comparable outcomes with respect to all parameters.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14290DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patches prepared
16
electrofulguration-assisted dermabrasion
8
manual dermabrasion
8
dermabrasion patients
8
patients undergoing
8
non-cultured epidermal
8
epidermal cell
8
cell suspension
8
treatment stable
8
stable vitiligo
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!