A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Five-Category Intelligent Auxiliary Diagnosis Model of Common Fundus Diseases Based on Fundus Images. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study addresses the shortage of ophthalmologists in China by proposing a five-category intelligent diagnosis model for common eye diseases like retinal vein occlusion and diabetic retinopathy.
  • The research involved collecting and analyzing 2,000 fundus images, training three different models, and achieving over 90% accuracy in diagnosing these conditions.
  • The findings will assist primary care doctors in delivering better diagnostic services to ophthalmologic patients, improving patient care overall.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The discrepancy of the number between ophthalmologists and patients in China is large. Retinal vein occlusion (RVO), high myopia, glaucoma, and diabetic retinopathy (DR) are common fundus diseases. Therefore, in this study, a five-category intelligent auxiliary diagnosis model for common fundus diseases is proposed; the model's area of focus is marked.

Methods: A total of 2000 fundus images were collected; 3 different 5-category intelligent auxiliary diagnosis models for common fundus diseases were trained via different transfer learning and image preprocessing techniques. A total of 1134 fundus images were used for testing. The clinical diagnostic results were compared with the diagnostic results. The main evaluation indicators included sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), 95% confidence interval (CI), kappa, and accuracy. The interpretation methods were used to obtain the model's area of focus in the fundus image.

Results: The accuracy rates of the 3 intelligent auxiliary diagnosis models on the 1134 fundus images were all above 90%, the kappa values were all above 88%, the diagnosis consistency was good, and the AUC approached 0.90. For the 4 common fundus diseases, the best results of sensitivity, specificity, and F1-scores of the 3 models were 88.27%, 97.12%, and 84.02%; 89.94%, 99.52%, and 93.90%; 95.24%, 96.43%, and 85.11%; and 88.24%, 98.21%, and 89.55%, respectively.

Conclusions: This study designed a five-category intelligent auxiliary diagnosis model for common fundus diseases. It can be used to obtain the diagnostic category of fundus images and the model's area of focus.

Translational Relevance: This study will help the primary doctors to provide effective services to all ophthalmologic patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8212443PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.7.20DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

common fundus
24
fundus diseases
24
intelligent auxiliary
20
auxiliary diagnosis
20
fundus images
20
five-category intelligent
12
diagnosis model
12
model common
12
fundus
12
model's area
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!