Estimating cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in Vietnam.

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res

Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.

Published: June 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • There are currently no national cancer screening programs in Vietnam, prompting a study to analyze the cost-effectiveness of an annual colorectal cancer (CRC) screening for those aged 50 and above.
  • The study used a decision tree and a Markov model, calculating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to compare a screening group using guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) versus a no-screening group, finding the ICER to be $1,388 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).
  • Results indicated that an annual CRC screening strategy is cost-effective and could support the development of a national screening program in Vietnam.

Article Abstract

Presently, there are no national screening programs for cancer in Vietnam. This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of an annual colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program from the healthcare service provider's perspective for the Vietnamese population.The economic model consisted of adecision tree and aMarkov model. Adecision tree was constructed for comparing two strategies, including ascreening group with aguaiac-based fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and ano-screening group in general populations, aged 50 years and above. The Markov model projected outcomes over a25-year horizon. The cost-effectiveness outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) represented by costs per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).When compared with no screening, ICER was $1,388per QALY with an increased cost of $ 43.98 and again of 0.032 QALY (Willingness to pay $2,590). The uptake rate of gFOBT, cost of colonoscopy, and the total cost of screening contributed to the largest impact on the ICER. PSA showed that results were robust to variation in parameter estimates, with annual screening remaining cost-effective compared with no screening.Our screening strategy could be considered cost-effective compared to ano screening strategy. Our findings could be potentially used to develop aCRC national screening program.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2021.1940963DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

screening
9
colorectal cancer
8
cancer vietnam
8
national screening
8
screening program
8
adecision tree
8
cost-effective compared
8
screening strategy
8
estimating cost-effectiveness
4
cost-effectiveness screening
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!