Objectives: We have previously established a method to measure transfer of nutrients between mother, placenta and fetus in vivo. The method includes measurements of maternal and fetal blood flow by Doppler ultrasound prior to spinal anaesthesia. Spinal anaesthesia affects maternal blood pressure and cardiac output. We aimed to determine the effect of spinal anaesthesia in mothers undergoing an elective caesarean section on blood pressure, heart rate and cardiac output, and whether cardiac output levels were comparable before induction of spinal anaesthesia and before delivery.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary hospital in Norway.

Participants: 76 healthy women with uneventful pregnancies undergoing an elective caesarean section.

Interventions: We induced spinal anaesthesia with a standard prevention of hypotension including intravenous fluid coloading and phenylephrine infusion.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Primary outcome measure was maternal cardiac output, and secondary outcome measures were invasive systolic blood pressure and heart rate. We measured heart rate and blood pressure by continuous invasive monitoring with a cannula in the radial artery. Cardiac output was estimated based on continuous arterial waveform. We compared maternal parameters 30 s before induction of spinal anaesthesia to 30 s before delivery.

Results: Median age at delivery was 34.5 (range 21-43) years and 17 of 76 women were nulliparous. The most prevalent indications were previous caesarean section and maternal request. Among 76 included women, 71 had sufficient data for analysis of endpoints. Median cardiac output was 6.51 (IQR (5.56-7.54) L/min before spinal anaesthesia and 6.40 (5.83-7.56) L/min before delivery (p=0.40)). Median invasive systolic blood pressure increased from 128.5 (120.1-142.7) mm Hg to 134.1 (124.0-146.6) mm Hg (p=0.014), and mean heart rate decreased from 86.0 (SD 13.9) to 75.2 (14.2) (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Maternal cardiac output at the time of caesarean delivery is comparable to levels before induction of spinal anaesthesia.

Trial Registration Number: NCT00977769.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204191PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046102DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

spinal anaesthesia
32
cardiac output
28
blood pressure
24
heart rate
16
pressure cardiac
8
spinal
8
anaesthesia
8
prospective cohort
8
undergoing elective
8
elective caesarean
8

Similar Publications

Comparison of AI applications and anesthesiologist's anesthesia method choices.

BMC Anesthesiol

January 2025

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Mardin Artuklu University School of Medicine, Diyarbakır Road, Artuklu, Mardin, 47100, Turkey.

Background: In medicine, Artificial intelligence has begun to be utilized in nearly every domain, from medical devices to the interpretation of imaging studies. There is still a need for more experience and more studies related to the comprehensive use of AI in medicine. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the ability of AI to make decisions regarding anesthesia methods and to compare the most popular AI programs from this perspective.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: This was a narrative review.

Objective: The objective of this review was to summarize the current evidence and knowledge gaps regarding anesthesia and pain management for scoliosis surgery, including multimodal analgesia, and identify the best anesthetic approach to scoliosis surgery that ensures patient safety and pain relief even in the postoperative period, with minimal influence on SSEP monitoring.

Summary Of Background Data: Spinal surgeries and fusions for scoliosis are associated with high pain levels.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction Effective postoperative analgesia following lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) is crucial for promoting surgical recovery and fostering maternal-neonatal bonding. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of two IV dexamethasone doses (8 mg and 4 mg) in managing postoperative pain in LSCS patients. The objective was to assess whether the 4 mg dose provides comparable pain relief to the 8 mg dose, with the goal of identifying the optimal dosage for effective pain management with minimal side effects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Multimodal analgesia and anesthesia have become the gold standard in total joint arthroplasty to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption and minimize complications associated with opioid use. There are several elements in an effective multimodal protocol, including oral medications, periarticular injection, regional nerve blocks, and spinal and general anesthesia. Many nonopioid medications are often used, such as acetaminophen and NSAIDs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!