AI Article Synopsis

  • OSCC is the most common cancer in males in Sri Lanka, with neck metastasis being a key prognostic factor.
  • A study of 187 OSCC patients showed only 6.4% had positive level V lymph nodes after neck dissection.
  • It is suggested that routine neck dissection, including level V, may not be necessary, and alternative factors like positivity in levels III and IV should guide treatment decisions.

Article Abstract

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains the most common cancer among males in Sri Lanka. Metastasis to neck is a crucial prognostic factor. A modified radical/radical neck dissection including levels I -V, was performed in patients with OSCC who had a clinically positive neck (cN+). Currently, evidence suggests that sparing level V in a cN+ may be justified due to less chance of metastasis in early stages of the disease. To the best of our knowledge, the incidence of metastasis to level V in patients with cN+s has not been previously investigated in a Sri Lankan context. We aimed to determine level V lymph node metastasis and related clinicopathological indicators in cN+s in patients with OSCC. A multicentre retrospective study investigated postoperative biopsy reports of 187 patients for five years. OSCC patients with cN+s who underwent neck dissections of levels I-V were included. Only 6.4% of patients had histopathologically positive level V lymph nodes. A total of 127 lymph nodes were harvested from level V of those who showed level V positivity and out of them 68 were positive with a third of cases showing extranodal extension (ENE). The buccal mucosa (n=4) and lateral aspect of the anterior two thirds of the tongue (n=4) were the common primary sites for level V metastasis. In patients who showed positivity in levels III and IV, a considerably higher probability of level V nodes being positive was seen, which was statistically significant (p = 0.0001). We have concluded that the routine performance of a modified radical/radical neck dissection for cN+s should be stopped, as the incidence of Level V positivity is significantly low. Assessing the cN+ for N stage, status of levels III and IV, pattern of invasion, differentiation, and the site may be used instead as predictors for level V positivity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.09.027DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

level lymph
12
lymph nodes
12
level positivity
12
level
11
incidence metastasis
8
metastasis level
8
clinically positive
8
sri lankan
8
patients
8
oral squamous
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!