Quantitative study of preoperative staging of gastric cancer using intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging as a potential clinical index.

Purpose: To determine the utility of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging in quantitative analysis of preoperative tumor (T) and node (N) stages of gastric cancer, and to quantify the diagnostic threshold of IVIM parameters for serosal invasion and lymphatic metastasis.

Materials And Methods: From October 2016 to February 2020, 98 patients with gastric cancer who were receiving treatment in Zhongshan Hospital, China, were subject to an IVIM sequence imaging analysis. The IVIM sequence data were imported into software for post-processing of tumor regions of interest, and the IVIM parameters (the microvascular volume fraction (f), the molecular diffusion coefficient (D) and perfusion-related incoherent microcirculation (D*) were calculated. The variation of these IVIM parameters with different tumor-node metastasis (TNM) stages were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. The IVIM parameters of serosal invasion and lymphatic metastasis were examined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and t-tests.

Results: A total of 98 gastric cancer patients (65 males and 33 females) with an average age of 61.9 years were enrolled in this study. There were 14 patients in stage T1, 14 in stage T2, 10 in stage T3 and 60 in stage T4. There were 37 patients in stage N0, 19 in stage N1, 18 in stage N2 and 24 in stage N3. Statistically significant associations were found between the D values and T stages of gastric cancer. The D values of stage T4 cancers were significantly different from those of stage T2, T3 and T4 cancers. The D value decreased with increasing T stage. The mean D values of stages were 1.432 × 10 mm/s (T1), 1.225 × 10 mm/s (T2), 1.154 × 10 mm/s (T3) and 0.9468 × 10 mm/s (T4). The extent of the invasion of serosa was found to be significantly correlated with D value, with the diagnostic threshold for D being 1.107 × 10 mm/s. In addition, different pathological N stages of gastric cancer lesions showed statistically significantly variations in f values, but no correlation was found with different N stages. Finally, the extent of lymphatic metastasis was found to be correlated with D values, with the diagnostic threshold being 1.1739 × 10 mm/s. There was no statistically significant correlation between the IVIM MRI parameters and tumor size. The grade of tumor was found to be significantly correlated with D* value, with the diagnostic threshold for D* being 1.516 × 10 mm/s. There was no statistically significant correlation between the ADC value and tumor size. There was a significant difference in the ADC values among different T and N stage cancers. ADC value had statistically significant to distinguish gastric cancer with or without serosal invasion, its detection efficiency was not as high as that of D value, with an AUC of 0.628 and 0.830, respectively. The ADC value was not statistically significant in distinguishing gastric cancer with or without lymphatic metastasis (P ≥ 0.05). The ADC value had not statistically significant in distinguishing gastric cancer between low and medium-high grade (P ≥ 0.05).

Conclusion: We found that significant differences existed between whole-volume IVIM parameters of different T or N stages in gastric cancers, and were able to quantify different T or N stages of gastric cancer by the values of these parameters. The results of this quantitative study provide new tools for evaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer and will be valuable for the development of an new imaging method for determining the morphological stages of gastric cancer.