Evaluation of the histological and biomechanical properties of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate scaffold for pelvic organ prolapse, compared with polypropylene mesh in a rabbit model.

Introduction And Hypothesis: Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) is a biopolymer produced by Escherichia coli K12 bacteria. P4HB is fully resorbed in vivo by 18-24 months post-implantation. The aim of this study is to evaluate P4HB in the rabbit abdomen and vagina to determine that the biomechanical and histological properties are similar to the standard polypropylene mesh. Our hypothesis is that the histological and biomechanical properties of a fully absorbable graft will be similar to a lightweight polypropylene (PP) mesh when implanted in rabbit vagina and abdomen.

Methods: Sixteen (n = 16) female New Zealand White (retired breeder) rabbits were equally divided between two time points (3 and 9 months). A total of 17 rabbits were used owing to one death secondary to suspected cardiomyopathy. P4HB scaffold and PP mesh were subcutaneously and peri-vaginally implanted into the rabbit abdomen and vagina respectively. All rabbits had both posterior and anterior vaginal implants, and half of the rabbits had four abdominal implants in addition to the vaginal implants. The abdominal implants were 4.5 cm long × 1.5 cm wide whereas the vaginal implants were 1.5 cm long × 0.5 cm wide. At 3 and 9 months, gross necropsy was performed and samples were obtained, sectioned, stained and evaluated via histological analysis. Specimens were assessed for host inflammatory response, neovascularization, elastin content, and collagen deposition/maturation. Specimens were also biomechanically evaluated via uniaxial tensile test to determine the stiffness, ultimate tensile strength and load at ultimate tensile strength of the device/tissue composite.

Results: No abdominal mesh exposures were noted. A comparable number of asymptomatic partial vaginal exposures were observed at 3 months (P4HB: n = 3; PP: n = 2) and 9 months (P4HB: n = 3; PP: n = 2) respectively. Histological analysis of specimens showed comparable results in the P4HB and PP groups at 3 and 9 months post-implantation. Although no acute inflammation was seen, chronic inflammation was demonstrated in all specimens. Elastic fibers were present in the 3-month vaginal PP and P4HB specimens, but were not seen again. There was an increase in type I/III collagen noted over time. Biomechanical evaluation of the vaginal mesh tissue complex showed ultimate tensile strength was not significantly different between P4HB and PP groups at 3 (P = 0.625) and 9 months (P = 0.250) respectively.

Conclusions: P4HB scaffold may represent a fully absorbable alternative to permanent mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair.