A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 144

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 144
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 212
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3106
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Prognostic Value of Pre-Treatment CT Radiomics and Clinical Factors for the Overall Survival of Advanced (IIIB-IV) Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients. | LitMetric

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of pre-treatment CT radiomics and clinical factors for the overall survival (OS) of advanced (IIIB-IV) lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Methods: This study involved 165 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. The Lasso-Cox regression model was used for feature selection and radiomics signature building. Then a clinical model was built based on clinical factors; a combined model in the form of nomogram was constructed with both clinical factors and the radiomics signature. Harrell's concordance index (C-Index) and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves at cut-off time points of 1-, 2-, and 3- year were used to estimate and compare the predictive ability of all three models. Finally, the discriminatory ability and calibration of the nomogram were analyzed.

Results: Thirteen significant features were selected to build the radiomics signature whose C-indexes were 0.746 (95% CI, 0.699 to 0.792) in the training cohort and 0.677 (95% CI, 0.597 to 0.766) in the validation cohort. The C-indexes of combined model achieved 0.799 (95% CI, 0.757 to 0.84) in the training cohort and 0.733 (95% CI, 0.656 to 0.81) in the validation cohort, which outperformed the clinical model and radiomics signature. Moreover, the areas under the curve (AUCs) of the radiomic signature for 2-year prediction was superior to that of the clinical model. The combined model had the best AUCs for 2- and 3-year predictions.

Conclusions: Radiomic signatures and clinical factors have prognostic value for OS in advanced (IIIB-IV) lung adenocarcinoma patients. The optimal model should be selected according to different cut-off time points in clinical application.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8193844PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.628982DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical factors
20
lung adenocarcinoma
16
radiomics signature
16
advanced iiib-iv
12
iiib-iv lung
12
clinical model
12
combined model
12
clinical
9
prognostic pre-treatment
8
pre-treatment radiomics
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!