AI Article Synopsis

  • This study aimed to validate a predictive model for 30-day adverse events (AEs) following spine surgery, as reliable predictions were previously lacking.
  • The research involved 276 adult patients who underwent spine surgery and compared the actual AEs observed to the predicted ones using the RAT-Spine model.
  • Of the patients studied, 76 experienced at least one adverse event within 30 days post-surgery, highlighting a notable incidence of complications.

Article Abstract

Background Context: We lack models that reliably predict 30-day postoperative adverse events (AEs) following spine surgery.

Purpose: We externally validated a previously developed predictive model for common 30-day adverse events (AEs) after spine surgery.

Study Design/setting: This prospective cohort study utilizes inpatient and outpatient data from a tertiary academic medical center.

Patient Sample: We assessed a prospective cohort of all 276 adult patients undergoing spine surgery in the Department of Neurosurgery at a tertiary academic institution between April 1, 2018 and October 31, 2018. No exclusion criteria were applied.

Outcome Measures: Incidence of observed AEs was compared with predicted incidence of AEs. Fifteen assessed AEs included: pulmonary complications, congestive heart failure, neurological complications, pneumonia, cardiac dysrhythmia, renal failure, myocardial infarction, wound infection, pulmonary embolus, deep venous thrombosis, wound hematoma, other wound complication, urinary tract infection, delirium, and other infection.

Methods: Our group previously developed the Risk Assessment Tool for Adverse Events after Spine Surgery (RAT-Spine), a predictive model of AEs within 30 days following spine surgery using a cohort of approximately one million patients from combined Medicare and MarketScan databases. We applied RAT-Spine to the single academic institution prospective cohort by entering each patient's preoperative medical and demographic characteristics and surgical type. The model generated a patient-specific overall risk score ranging from 0 to 1 representing the probability of occurrence of any AE. The predicted risks are presented as absolute percent risk and divided into low (<17%), medium (17%-28%), and high (>28%).

Results: Among the 276 patients followed prospectively, 76 experienced at least one 30-day postoperative AE. Slightly more than half of the cohort were women (53.3%). The median age was slightly lower in the non-AE cohort (63 vs. 66.5 years old). Patients with Medicaid comprised 2.5% of the non-AE cohort and 6.6% of the AE cohort. Spinal fusion was performed in 59.1% of cases, which was comparable across cohorts. There was good agreement between the predicted AE and observed AE rates, Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0.64 (95% CI 0.56-0.710). The incidence of observed AEs in the prospective cohort was 17.8% among the low-risk group, 23.0% in the medium-risk group, and 38.4% in the high risk group (p =.003).

Conclusions: We externally validated a model for postoperative AEs following spine surgery (RAT-Spine). The results are presented as low-, moderate-, and high-risk designations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.06.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

spine surgery
20
adverse events
16
prospective cohort
16
predictive model
12
aes spine
12
cohort
9
events spine
8
30-day postoperative
8
aes
8
events aes
8

Similar Publications

A comparative study of curve flexibility assessment in supine traction, push-prone and push-prone traction radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Spine Deform

January 2025

Spine Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute of Orthopedics, Lerdsin Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, 190 Silom Road, Bangkok, 10500, Thailand.

Study Design: A prospective comparative study.

Objectives: To compare the curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using supine traction push-prone and push-prone traction radiographs and to determine which method is more effective in predicting the postsurgical correction.

Background: Preserving spinal motion is one of the critical objectives in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Seipin Deficiency Impairs Motor Coordination in Mice by Compromising Spinal Cord Myelination.

Neuromolecular Med

January 2025

Department of Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shanxi Medical University, No 56, Xinjian Nan Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, China.

The integrity of the myelin sheath of the spinal cord (SC) is essential for motor coordination. Seipin is an endoplasmic reticulum transmembrane protein highly expressed in adipose tissue and motor neurons in the SC. It was reported Seipin deficiency induced lipid dysregulation and neurobehavioral deficits, but the underlying mechanism, especially in SC, remains to be elucidated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Locomotion is controlled by spinal circuits that interact with supraspinal drives and sensory feedback from the limbs. These sensorimotor interactions are disrupted following spinal cord injury. The thoracic lateral hemisection represents an experimental model of an incomplete spinal cord injury, where connections between the brain and spinal cord are abolished on one side of the cord.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: Retrospective study.

Objective: To elucidate the factors influencing the identification of causative microorganisms in vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) and the effectiveness of different culture methods in increasing the identification rate.

Methods: A total of 252 patients diagnosed with and treated for VO at a single hospital were enrolled.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: cross-sectional survey.

Objectives: To evaluate AO Spine members' practices and comfort in managing metastatic and primary spine tumors, explore the use of decision-support and patient assessment tools, and identify knowledge gaps and future needs in spine oncology.

Methods: An online survey was distributed to AO Spine members to query comfort levels with key decisions in spinal oncology management, utilization of decision frameworks and spine oncology-specific instruments, and educational material preferences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!