AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aimed to assess how the angle of implants, the type of partial tooth loss (non-free-end), and the number of scan bodies influence the accuracy of digital impressions for multiple implants in partially edentulous jaws.
  • - Four different partially edentulous jaw models were scanned multiple times, and the results were compared to check the accuracy and precision of the scans using statistical analysis.
  • - Results indicated that implants placed at a 17-degree angle provided more accurate digital impressions compared to parallel implants, while the type of tooth loss improved accuracy but the number of scan bodies had no significant effect on the results.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of implant angulation, non-free-end partial edentulism, and number of scan bodies on the accuracy of digital impressions of multiple implants in partially edentulous arches.

Materials And Methods: Four reference models of partially edentulous mandibles with implants (RM1, RM2, RM3, and RM4) representing different intraoral situations were each scanned 10 times by an intraoral scanner. Reference scans were obtained by a laboratory scanner. Test scans were compared with reference scans to obtain the distance deviations (Δd) and angular deviations (Δθ) between scan bodies for trueness assessment. Differences among the repeated test scans of each model were measured and recorded as Δdp and Δθp for precision assessment. The Student t test (α = .05) was used to compare Δd, Δθ, Δdp, and Δθp of different reference models, including RM2 vs RM1 (effect of non-free-end partial edentulism), RM3 vs RM1 (effect of implant angulation), and RM4 vs RM1 (effect of number of scan bodies).

Results: The implant with 17-degree angulation in RM3 showed significantly lower Δd, Δθ, and Δθp compared with the parallel implant in RM1 (Δd: P = .0382, Δθ: P = .0267, Δθp: P = .0417). The RM2 of non-free-end partial edentulism had lower distance and angular deviations than RM1, but without a significant difference. The number of scan bodies had no significant effect on the Δd, Δθ, Δdp, and Δθp of RM4 and RM1.

Conclusion: Angulated implants showed better accuracy of digital impressions in partially edentulous arches compared with parallel implants. Non-free-end partial edentulism was attributed to improved accuracy, while the number of scan bodies showed no effect.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.8532DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-free-end partial
16
partial edentulism
16
number scan
16
scan bodies
16
accuracy digital
12
digital impressions
12
partially edentulous
12
Δdp Δθp
12
Δd Δθ
12
impressions multiple
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • - The study aimed to assess how the angle of implants, the type of partial tooth loss (non-free-end), and the number of scan bodies influence the accuracy of digital impressions for multiple implants in partially edentulous jaws.
  • - Four different partially edentulous jaw models were scanned multiple times, and the results were compared to check the accuracy and precision of the scans using statistical analysis.
  • - Results indicated that implants placed at a 17-degree angle provided more accurate digital impressions compared to parallel implants, while the type of tooth loss improved accuracy but the number of scan bodies had no significant effect on the results.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!