The present review acknowledges the tremendous impact of Stephan Perren's strain theory, considered with respect to the earlier contributions of Roux and Pauwels. Then, it provides further insight by examining how the concept of reverse dynamisation extended Perren's theory within a modern context. A key factor of this more contemporary theory is that it introduces variable mechanical conditions at different time points during bone healing, opening the possibility of manipulating biology through mechanics to achieve the desired clinical outcome. The discussion focusses on the current state of the art and the most recent advances made towards optimising and accelerating bone regeneration, by actively controlling the mechanical environment as healing progresses. Reverse dynamisation utilises a very specific mechanical manipulation regimen, with conditions initially flexible to encourage and expedite early callus formation. Once callus has formed, the mechanical conditions are intentionally modified to create a rigid environment under which the soft callus is quickly converted to hard callus, bridging the fracture site and leading to a more rapid union. The relevant literature, principally animal studies, was surveyed to provide ample evidence in support of the effectiveness of reverse dynamisation. By providing a modern perspective on Stephan Perren's strain theory, reverse dynamisation perhaps holds the key to tipping the balance in favour of a more rapid and reliable union when treating acute fractures, osteotomies, non-unions and other circumstances where it is necessary to regenerate bone.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v041a43 | DOI Listing |
Injury
December 2024
Hull Royal Infirmary, Anlaby Road, Kingston upon Hull HU3 2JZ, UK. Electronic address:
Frame configuration for the management of complex tibial fractures is highly variable and is dependent upon both fracture pattern and surgeon preference. The optimal number of rings to use when designing a frame remains uncertain. Traditionally larger, multi-ring-per-segment constructs have been assumed to offer optimal stability and therefore favourable conditions for fracture healing but there is little in-vivo evidence for this and the recent concept of reverse dynamisation challenges this approach.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOTA Int
March 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Orthopaedic surgeons routinely assess the biomechanical environment of a fracture to create a fixation construct that provides the appropriate amount of stability in efforts to optimize fracture healing. Emerging concepts and technologies including reverse dynamization, "smart plates" that measure construct strain, and FractSim software that models fracture strain represent recent developments in optimizing construct biomechanics to accelerate bone healing and minimize construct failure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Bone Joint Surg Am
December 2023
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
This article was updated on December 20, 2023, because of previous errors, which were discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. Figure 4 has been replaced with a figure that presents different p values. Also, on page 1943, the text that had read: "Quantitative microCT confirmed that the total volume of the regenerate in the RD group was much smaller compared with the SF (p = 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOTA Int
May 2023
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAA.
At the 2021 annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, the Basic Science Focus Forum hosted its first ever debate-style symposium focused on biomechanics and fracture repair. The 3 subjects of debate were "Mechanics versus Biology-Which is 'More Important' to Consider?" "Locked Plate versus Forward Dynamization versus Reverse Dynamization-Which Way Should I Go?" and "Sawbones versus Cadaver Models-What Should I Believe Most?" These debates were held because fracture healing is a highly organized synergistic response between biological factors and the local mechanical environment. Multiple studies have demonstrated that both factors play roles in governing bone healing responses, and the causal relationships between the 2 remain unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOTA Int
March 2022
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Objectives: Current surgical fracture treatment paradigms, which use rigid metallic constructs to heal bones, provide reasonable clinical outcomes; however, they do not leverage recent advances in our understanding of bone healing and mechanotransduction throughout bone healing. The objective of this review was to investigate the efficacy and potential clinical applicability of surgical techniques and implants that deliberately introduce interfragmentary motion throughout the healing process.
Methods: The authors searched PubMed and Google Scholar databases for articles reporting on fracture repair using dynamic locking plates, dynamized surgical techniques, and reverse dynamization.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!