Superior outcome for splenectomised patients in a population-based study of splenic marginal zone lymphoma in Sweden.

Br J Haematol

Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

Published: August 2021

Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is a rare low-grade B-cell lymphoma where associations with viral hepatitis and autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (AID) have been indicated. We aimed at assessing the prevalence of viral hepatitis and AID at SMZL diagnosis and outcome by treatment in a Swedish population-based study. A total of 277 SMZL patients registered in the Swedish Lymphoma Register in 2007-2017 were included. A history of viral hepatitis was reported in five (2%) patients and AID prior to SMZL in 72/240 (30%) patients. Treatment was given up front for 207 (75%) patients. Splenectomy with or without systemic treatment was performed in 119 (57%) and was associated with statistically significantly better overall survival [hazard ratio, HR = 0·47 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0·23-0·93), P = 0·03] and progression-free survival (HR = 0·55, 95% CI: 0·35-0·86, P = 0·008) compared to non-splenectomised patients in multivariable analyses. The up-front splenectomised group was younger and generally had a lower Ann Arbor stage, but also more frequently B symptoms and high lactate dehydrogenase than the non-splenectomised group. Viral hepatitis and AID history did not affect SMZL outcome. We report high incidence of AIDs and low incidence of viral hepatitis in this population-based study of SMZL. Splenectomy up front was associated with a favourable outcome.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjh.17577DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

viral hepatitis
20
population-based study
12
splenic marginal
8
marginal zone
8
zone lymphoma
8
hepatitis aid
8
patients
6
smzl
6
viral
5
hepatitis
5

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The report updates the 1999 CDC Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health to include new advancements and lessons learned in evaluation and public health.
  • The 2024 framework introduces a nonprescriptive tool with six steps for effective evaluation planning and implementation, while emphasizing engagement, equity, and learning from insights.
  • It serves as a guide for designing evaluations applicable to various programs, enhancing evidence-based decision-making, and improving program outcomes across different areas.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!