Hospital effects drive variation in access to inpatient rehabilitation after trauma.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg

From the Department of Surgery (A.L., J.R.M., N.F.S., M.R.H., J.B.D., J.W.S.), Center for Health Outcomes and Policy (A.L., J.R.M., Z.F., M.R.H., J.B.D., J.W.S.), and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (B.W.O.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Published: August 2021

Background: Postacute care rehabilitation is critically important to recover after trauma, but many patients do not have access. A better understanding of the drivers behind inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) use has the potential for major cost-savings as well as higher-quality and more equitable patient care. We sought to quantify the variation in hospital rates of trauma patient discharge to inpatient rehabilitation and understand which factors (patient vs. injury vs. hospital level) contribute the most.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 668,305 adult trauma patients admitted to 900 levels I to IV trauma centers between 2011 and 2015 using the National Trauma Data Bank. Participants were included if they met the following criteria: age >18 years, Injury Severity Score of ≥9, identifiable injury type, and who had one of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services preferred diagnoses for inpatient rehabilitation under the "60% rule."

Results: The overall risk- and reliability-adjusted hospital rates of discharge to IRF averaged 18.8% in the nonelderly adult cohort (18-64 years old) and 23.4% in the older adult cohort (65 years or older). Despite controlling for all patient-, injury-, and hospital-level factors, hospital discharge of patients to IRF varied substantially between hospital quintiles and ranged from 9% to 30% in the nonelderly adult cohort and from 7% to 46% in the older adult cohort. Proportions of total variance ranged from 2.4% (patient insurance) to 12.1% (injury-level factors) in the nonelderly adult cohort and from 0.3% (patient-level factors) to 26.0% (unmeasured hospital-level factors) in the older adult cohort.

Conclusion: Among a cohort of injured patients with diagnoses that are associated with significant rehabilitation needs, the hospital at which a patient receives their care may drive a patient's likelihood of recovering at an IRF just as much, if not more, than their clinical attributes.

Level Of Evidence: Care management, level IV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375412PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003215DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adult cohort
20
inpatient rehabilitation
16
nonelderly adult
12
older adult
12
trauma patients
8
hospital rates
8
hospital-level factors
8
hospital
7
cohort
7
adult
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!