Auxiliary liver transplantation for management of acute liver failure in children - Systematic review.

Introduction: Liver transplantation (LT) remains the standard of care in the treatment of acute pediatric liver failure (PALF) for the replacement of a severely damaged native liver in patients who are unlikely to recover. However, this is burdened by the consequences of long-term immunosuppression. Auxiliary partial liver orthotopic transplantation (APOLT) has emerged as a possible improved approach, by providing a graft that assures liver function until the regeneration of the native liver occurs, and then allows for possible progression to immunosuppression withdrawal. No previous systematic review has assessed APOLT for PALF. The aim of this work is to provide information on survival, postoperative complications, and withdrawal of immunosuppression after APOLT for PALF.

Methods: The study was carried out according to the recommendations of the preferred report items for systematic reviews and meta-analyzes (PRISMA). We searched several electronic databases until October 31st, 2020, using the search terms "acute liver failure", "auxiliary liver transplant" and the MESH term "liver failure, acute". All types of clinical publications that presented results on APOLT for PALF, in English or Portuguese, and restricted to humans and for children under 18 years old were included. The following exclusion criteria were applied: "follow-up time <6 months", "does not report complications" and "does not report immunosuppression regimen (double vs triple)". Demographic data, clinical characteristics at the time of surgery and postoperative results were analyzed.

Results: A total of 14 references (including 45 patients) were selected, including 3 case series (6-20 patients) and 11 case reports. Of the 45 subjects, 33 (73.3%) were male and 12 (26.7%) female. In most cases (n = 30; 66.7%), the cause of PALF was undetermined. All patients underwent APOLT. Their median age was 9 (range 0.6-17) years. In the postoperative period, the immunosuppression regimen was double in 34 (75.6%) and triple in 11 (24.4%) individuals. The main postoperative complications were rejection and infection. Over a follow-up period of 6 months to 14 years, 10 (22.2%) patients died. The main cause of death was sepsis (70%). Six (13.3%) patients were retransplanted. Of the survivors (n = 35), 68.6% achieved complete withdrawal from the immunosuppression regimen.

Conclusion: Based on current published evidence, APOLT for the treatment of PALF is a safe option, with an acceptable rate of complications and mortality. It has the great advantage of providing an immunosuppression-free life in the majority (68.6%) of survivors.