A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Can Established Vapers Distinguish Different PG:VG Ratios? A Pilot Study. | LitMetric

Can Established Vapers Distinguish Different PG:VG Ratios? A Pilot Study.

Tob Regul Sci

Liane M. Schneller, Pre-Doctoral Trainee, Department of Health Behavior, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY. Taylor S. Vanderbush, Laboratory Technician, Department of Health Behavior, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY. Richard J. O'Connor, Professor of Oncology, Department of Health Behavior, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY.

Published: May 2018

Objectives: Using the triangle test, this study explores whether established vapers can distinguish small differences between e-liquid propylene glycol: vegetable glycerin (PG:VG) ratios at fixed levels of nicotine and flavor, in order to examine the extent to which solvent ratios affects sensory experiences.

Methods: Watermelon flavored e-liquids (16mg/mL nicotine) used for this study differed in the ratio of PG:VG (30:70, 50:50; 70:30). Current vapers were randomized to one of 3 possible study conditions differing by PG:VG ratio. Participants sampled products following the triangle test, which presents 3 blinded products, 2 of which are identical. They were asked to identify and rate the 'odd' product.

Results: Of the 14 participants who completed the study, 34.9% were able to determine the 'odd' product. Ratings on the subjective response scales for the 'odd' product were quite low. Aversion scores differed significantly by correct identification of the 'odd' product (p = .045).

Conclusions: Established vapers in this study were unable to consistently distinguish PG:VG ratios, even for relatively large differences, and correct identification inconsistently related to subjective effects ratings. These preliminary findings suggest that the PG:VG ratio may not be a salient feature of vaping.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174837PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.18001/trs.4.3.6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

established vapers
12
'odd' product
12
vapers distinguish
8
distinguish pgvg
8
triangle test
8
pgvg ratios
8
pgvg ratio
8
correct identification
8
pgvg
6
study
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!