Out-of-pocket payment is one of the indicators measuring the achievement of Universal Health Coverage. According to the World Health Organization, for countries from the Asia Pacific Region, out-of-pocket payments should not exceed 30%-40% of total health expenditure. This study aimed to identify factors influencing out-of-pocket payment for the near-poor for outpatient healthcare services as well as across health facilities at different levels. The data of 1143 individuals using outpatient care were used for analysis. Healthcare payments were analyzed for those who sought outpatient care in the past 6 months. The Heckman selection model was used to control any bias resulting from self-selection of the insurance scheme. The finding revealed that health insurance reduces average out-of-pocket payments by about 21% ( < .001). Using private health facilities incurred more out-of-pocket payments than public health facilities ( < .001). The study suggested that health insurance for the near-poor should be modified to promote universal health coverage in Vietnam.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142235PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11786329211017411DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

health insurance
8
out-of-pocket payment
8
out-of-pocket payments
8
outpatient care
8
health
7
out-of-pocket
5
impact public
4
public health
4
insurance out-of-pocket
4
out-of-pocket health
4

Similar Publications

Context: A national assessment of osteoporosis drug therapy (ODT) use can inform the extent of underdiagnosis and undertreatment of osteoporosis.

Objective: The aim was to describe trends in ODT use by age, sex, fragility fracture, and documented osteoporosis.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of patient-quarter observations for adults aged ≥50 years with commercial or Medicare Advantage health insurance in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse between 2011 and 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Underserved populations are often at risk of experiencing systematic healthcare disparities. Existing disparities in care access, quality of care received, and treatment outcomes among patients with rheumatic disease are not well understood.

Methods: We conducted a targeted literature review to understand disparities in health outcomes, treatment patterns, and healthcare management faced by rheumatology patients in the United States, with a focus on rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Racial and Ethnic Disparity in the Administration of General Anesthesia.

Anesth Crit Care

October 2024

Department of Translational Research, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona CA 91766, USA.

Healthcare disparities continue to affect communities in the United States that are racially and ethnically diverse, disabled, and economically disadvantaged, even though medical and technological advancements have made great strides in these areas. Disparities in health outcomes and difficulties obtaining care for both acute and chronic illnesses are more common among these populations when compared to the overall population. Disparities in anesthesia care delivery have been documented in multiple studies, and they are based on factors such as patients' racial/ethnic background, gender, sexual orientation, ability to communicate in English, and accessibility to health insurance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This review comprehensively evaluates China's progress in care of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) by identifying achievements and gaps, reviewing ESKD-related policy initiatives, and proposing policy recommendations. In the past decade, China has made laudable progress in access to ESKD care with narrowed difference between the number of patients needing and receiving kidney replacement therapies (KRT). China has also experienced significant improvements in clinical quality and outcomes of ESKD care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Filipinos in the U.S. have worse colorectal cancer screening rates and outcomes than non-Hispanic Whites, despite 85% of Filipinos being proficient in English and having insurance rates, education, and incomes that exceed those of the general population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!