AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated nephro-ureteric stent insertion and exchange practices at a cancer center to assess safety and adherence to guidelines.
  • A total of 32 patients and 102 stent exchanges were reviewed over two years, showing successful exchanges with a mean interval of 12.3 weeks and only two failures linked to long delays between exchanges.
  • The findings suggest that extending the exchange period from 6 to 12 weeks is generally safe and could be incorporated into local protocols to improve patient compliance.

Article Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the nephro-ureteric stent (NUS) insertion and exchange practice in a tertiary referral cancer centre, and determine the safety and compliance with current guidelines. We also reviewed if increasing exchange time interval from 6 to 12 weeks was safe, and if this could be adopted into our local guidelines.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed covering 24 months from January 2017 to December 2018. All NUS insertions and exchanges performed in that period were analysed, including the number of exchanges the patient underwent, the time between subsequent exchanges, and the screening time. We also reviewed the indications for stent insertion, possible causes for failed stent exchange, and factors which led to significant delays in stent exchanges for some patients. A scatterplot of screening time versus time in situ was derived and correlation analysis performed using the Pearson coefficient.

Results: Thirty-two patients underwent de novo NUS insertion during the period, and 102 NUS exchanges were performed. The interval between stent exchanges ranged from 1 to 40 weeks, with a mean of 12.3 weeks (SD = 8.96 weeks). Screening time ranged from 33 s to 17 min, with a mean of 3 min 50 s (SD = 3 min 35 s). There were 100 successful exchanges, and two failed exchanges, accounting for 1.9% of total exchanges. In both failed cases, the reason for failed exchange was due to a prolonged period between exchanges (6 months in both cases). The reason for delay for stent exchange was due to non-attendance for scheduled appointments. There was a weakly positive correlation coefficient of 0.06 (screening time versus time period between insertions); however, this was not statistically significant (p = 0.81).

Conclusion: In this retrospective review, we have demonstrated that the recommended 6-week period between stent exchanges is unnecessary in the vast majority of cases, and that a longer interval between NUS exchanges, e.g. 8-12 weeks, is safe for the patient, and reduces screening time. This reduction in procedures also provides a significant potential saving to the radiology department in both monetary expense and limited angiography suite time.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9135782PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02657-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

screening time
20
stent exchange
12
exchanges
12
stent exchanges
12
time
10
stent
8
nephro-ureteric stent
8
tertiary referral
8
nus insertion
8
retrospective review
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!