Are Mobile Persons With Parkinson Disease Necessarily More Active?

J Neurol Phys Ther

Departments of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training (J.A.Z., T.B., T.R.D., T.N., T.D.E) and Occupational Therapy (D.F.), Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Physical Therapy (J.T.C.), University of New England, Portland, Maine; Department of Kinesiology (C.C.-S.), College of Agriculture, Health, and Natural Resources, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut; Program in Physical Therapy (R.P.D., K.S.R., G.M.E), Department of Neuroscience (G.M.E), and Department of Neurology (R.P.D., G.M.E), Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri; School of Public Health (M.L.), Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts; and Department of Neurology (M.S.-H., C.A.T.), Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Published: October 2021

Background And Purpose: Walking activity in persons with Parkinson disease (PD) is important for preventing functional decline. The contribution of walking activity to home and community mobility in PD is poorly understood.

Methods: Cross-sectional baseline data (N = 69) were analyzed from a randomized controlled PD trial. The Life-Space Assessment (LSA) quantified the extent, frequency, and independence across 5 expanding levels of home and community mobility, producing individual subscores and a total score. Two additional summed scores were used to represent mobility within (Levels 1-3) and beyond (Levels 4-5) neighborhood limits. An accelerometer measured walking activity for 7 days. Regression and correlation analyses evaluated relationships between daily steps and mobility scores. Mann-Whitney U tests secondarily compared differences in mobility scores between the active and sedentary groups.

Results: Walking activity contributed significantly to the summed Level 1-3 score (β = 0.001, P = 0.004) but not to the summed Level 4-5 (β = 0.001, P = 0.33) or total (β = 0.002, P = 0.07) scores. Walking activity was significantly related to Level 1 (ρ = 0.336, P = 0.005), Level 2 (ρ = 0.307, P = 0.010), and Level 3 (ρ = 0.314, P = 0.009) subscores. Only the summed Level 1-3 score (P = 0.030) was significantly different between the active and sedentary groups.

Discussion And Conclusions: Persons with PD who demonstrated greater mobility beyond the neighborhood were not necessarily more active; walking activity contributed more so to home and neighborhood mobility. Compared with LSA total score, the Level 1-3 summed score may be a more useful participation-level measure for assessing the impact of changes in walking activity.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1 available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A349).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8460597PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000362DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

walking activity
24
summed level
12
level 1-3
12
persons parkinson
8
parkinson disease
8
community mobility
8
total score
8
mobility scores
8
active sedentary
8
activity contributed
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!