Peer review: the case for neutral language.

Trends Cogn Sci

Interacting Minds Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. Electronic address:

Published: August 2021

Peer review is an integral part of scientific life, determining success in publishing, grant applications, and professional appointments. We argue for the importance of neutral language in peer review and provide examples of nonneutral linguistic and stylistic devices that emphasize a reviewer's personal response to the manuscript rather than their objective assessment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.05.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peer review
12
neutral language
8
language peer
8
review case
4
case neutral
4
review integral
4
integral scientific
4
scientific life
4
life determining
4
determining success
4

Similar Publications

The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Department of Defense (DOD) Work Group revised the 2013 VA/DOD Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for the Management of Bipolar Disorder (BD). This paper reviews the 2023 CPG and its development process, including how recommendations were made for evidence-based treatment in BD. Subject experts and key stakeholders developed 20 key questions and reviewed the published literature after a systematic search using the PICOTS (population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, timing of outcomes measurement, and setting) method.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The Chinese community constitutes the largest demographic and faces the highest rates of cancer incidence in Singapore. Given this, palliative care plays a crucial role in supporting individuals, particularly those nearing the end of life, with family serving as their primary source of support. Many Chinese family caregivers in Singapore reported significant unmet needs in cancer care provision, with studies indicating that they often bear the brunt of caregiving responsibilities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Nurse-Led/Involved Home-Based Interventions for Older Adults With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.

J Clin Nurs

January 2025

School of Nursing and Midwifery College of Health, Medicine, and Wellbeing Hunter and Medical Research Institute Healthcare Transformation Research Program, The Centre for Transformative Nursing, Midwifery, and Health Research, Hunter New England Local Health District, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.

Aims: To determine the effectiveness of nurse-led/involved home-based interventions for older people with COPD and to explore the experiences of older people and nurses with the interventions.

Design: A mixed-methods systematic review following the JBI methodology for mixed-methods systematic reviews.

Data Sources: The search included relevant and peer-reviewed studies published from January 2010 to December 2023 in CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, EMBASE, JBI, EMCARE and ProQuest.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: The aim of this literature review was to determine if a consensus could be reached on whether amblyopia treatment causes distress to patients and/or their guardians, and if so, establish the impact of this reported psychological distress upon paediatric patients and/or their parents/guardians.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted of all publications written in English. Search terms included both MeSH terms and alternatives related to amblyopia and psychological distress.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!