Implications of FDA Approval of a First Disease-Modifying Therapy for a Neurodegenerative Disease on the Design of Subsequent Clinical Trials.

Neurology

From the Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, Departments of Psychiatry and Human Behavior and Neurobiology and Behavior (J.D.G.), University of California, Irvine; and Penn Memory Center, Departments of Medicine, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and Neurology (J.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Published: September 2021

The goal of clinical research is to improve clinical practice. In progressive neurodegenerative conditions without any disease-slowing therapies, this will result in eventual approval of a first disease-modifying treatment. Clinical trials will still be needed to discover treatments that are more effective, safer, or more convenient. This will generate controversies over how to design these trials; specifically, controversies about the use of a placebo control. We consider ethical guidance for these studies with attention to 3 designs: placebo-controlled trials in the absence of the new drug, placebo-controlled trials with the approved drug as background therapy, and trials with the new drug as an active control. To understand the practical implications of these designs, we examine experiences in drug development in multiple sclerosis. We conclude by contemplating the future of clinical trials in Alzheimer disease.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8448555PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012329DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical trials
12
approval disease-modifying
8
placebo-controlled trials
8
trials
7
clinical
5
implications fda
4
fda approval
4
disease-modifying therapy
4
therapy neurodegenerative
4
neurodegenerative disease
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!