Background: The MRC-ICU, a novel regimen complexity scoring tool, provides an objective measure of medication regimen complexity in critically ill patients. The MRC-ICU may have the ability to evaluate the impact of critical care pharmacists on patient outcomes but requires further validation. The objective of this study was to confirm the external validity of the MRC-ICU scoring tool at multiple institutions and intensive care unit (ICU) settings.

Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study. The electronic medical record was reviewed to collect patient demographics and patient outcomes, and the medication administration record was reviewed to collect MRC-ICU scores at 24 hours, 48 hours, and ICU discharge. Validation was performed by assessing convergent and divergent validity of the score. Spearman rank-order correlation was used to determine correlation.

Results: A total of 230 patients were evaluated across both centers in both medical ICUs and surgical ICUs. Differences between the original center and the new site included that total number of orders (29 vs 126; P < 0.001) and total number of medication orders (17 vs 36; P < 0.001) were higher at the new site, whereas the original site had higher overall MRC-ICU scores (14 vs 11; P = 0.004). The MRC-ICU showed appropriate convergent validity with number of orders and medication orders (all P < 0.001) and appropriate divergent validity with no significant correlation found between age, weight, or gender (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions: External validity of the MRC-ICU has been confirmed through evaluation at an external site and in the surgical ICU population. The MRC-ICU scoring tool requires prospective evaluation to provide objective data regarding optimal pharmacist use.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxz330DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

scoring tool
16
complexity scoring
8
mrc-icu
8
regimen complexity
8
patient outcomes
8
external validity
8
validity mrc-icu
8
mrc-icu scoring
8
record reviewed
8
reviewed collect
8

Similar Publications

Objective: This systematic review was conducted to synthesize current research on the role of repeated transurethral resection of the bladder (re-TURB) and the emerging use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in discerning patient suitability for safely foregoing this procedure.

Evidence Acquisition: Employing a methodical literature search, we consulted several bibliographic databases including PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Embase. The review process adhered strictly to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is a popular natural-language processor that is able to analyze and respond to a variety of prompts, providing eloquent answers based on a collection of Internet data. ChatGPT has been considered an avenue for the education of resident physicians in the form of board preparation in the contemporary literature, where it has been applied against board study material across multiple medical specialties. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the performance of ChatGPT on the Personal Review of Learning in Obstetrics and Gynecology (PROLOG) assessments and gauge its specialty specific knowledge for educational applications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The dearth of research investigating the efficacy of virtual Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) training programs among female populations necessitates further exploration. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a 12-week ACFT virtual exercise program among female participants.

Materials And Methods: Nine female participants (age = 19.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring may be a useful tool for assessing cardiovascular disease in young adults, particularly in those with risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, or smoking. In this study, we aimed to address the risk factors for developing noncalcified plaque in young adults by assessing total plaque burden.

Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted among 1026 consecutive patients aged 18-45 years who underwent CAC scoring and coronary computed tomography (CT) angiograms for clinical indications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: Evaluate the utility of Delirium Risk Assessment Score (DRAS), Delirium Risk Assessment Tool (DRAT), and Delirium Elderly At-Risk (DEAR) in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusions.

Background: Surgical interventions can place patients at risk for postoperative delirium (POD), an acute and often severe cognitive impairment associated with poor outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!