Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
It is very important to investigate the expression of endometrial receptive markers in the endometrium during implantation. Therefore, we examined whether it would be possible to analyze endometrial receptivity using cells from embryo transfer catheters. A total of 81 cycles from 81 consenting patients were enrolled in this study. The tip of the embryo transfer (ET) catheter was cut and immersed in a dedicated reagent. Confirmation of cell distribution was carried out using a Papanicolaou stain and immunocytochemistry. Protein expression was carried out by immunocytochemistry. The expressions of estrogen receptor α, progesterone receptor, and homeobox A10 mRNA were analyzed using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. We analyzed the relationship between the gene expression profiles associated with pregnancy from endometrial cells. Samples collected from the ET catheter showed clear staining for endometrial cells. Most of the cells were endometrial epithelial cells. Cervical cells were not observed. The protein expression was also confirmed. Three genes were analyzed that are associated with endometrial receptivity. Progesterone receptor expression was 1.4-fold (p<0.05) and homeobox A10 was 2.8-fold (p<0.01) higher in patients who became non-pregnant group, compared to the pregnant group. Estrogen receptor α expression tended to be higher in the non-pregnant group (p=0.18). Our results suggest that endometrial receptivity can be evaluated using cells obtained from the ET catheter. This method may be useful for elucidating the cause of implantation failure by comparing a receptive and non-receptive endometrium at the time of ET.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00645-9 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!