Background: Various extratympanic recording electrodes have been used to make electrocochleography (ECochG) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements in clinics, translational research, and basic science laboratories. However, differences may exist in ECochG and ABR measurements depending on the different types of extratympanic electrodes that are used.

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to compare simultaneously recorded ECochG and ABR responses using three different extratympanic electrodes. This research helps clinicians and researchers to understand how electrode types and recording sites influence EcochG and ABR results. In addition, our findings could provide more normative data to the ECochG and ABR literature as well as give perspective on a preferred electrode approach when performing simultaneous ECochG and ABR testing.

Research Design: Ours was a repeated-measures study with measurements being made from individual participants on two separate sessions.

Study Sample: Twenty young adult females with normal hearing.

Procedure: A three-channel recording system was used to simultaneously record ECochG and ABR measurements in response to alternating polarity click stimuli. In each session, measurements were simultaneously recorded with a TipTrode electrode and one of the tympanic membrane (TM) electrodes.

Data Collection And Analysis: Suprathreshold summating potential (SP) and action potential (AP) of the ECochG and waves I, III, and V of the ABR, and threshold responses (AP and wave V) were identified.

Results: Compared with the ear canal TipTrode electrode, TM electrodes yielded suprathreshold amplitudes that were larger than those from the ear canal electrode, smaller SP-AP ratios, lower AP thresholds, and less variability. These findings can help guide choices made by clinicians, translational investigators, and basic science researchers on which type of extra-tympanic electrode to use for their intended purpose.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1727273DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ecochg abr
24
extratympanic electrodes
12
abr measurements
12
auditory brainstem
8
brainstem response
8
three extratympanic
8
ecochg
8
abr
8
basic science
8
simultaneously recorded
8

Similar Publications

Quick and appropriate diagnostics and the use of intraoperative monitoring (IM) of hearing during vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection increase the likelihood of hearing preservation. During surgery, various methods of IM can be used, i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The diagnosis of hidden hearing loss (HHL) in calm state has not yet been determined, while the nutritional status is not involved in its pathogenic risk factors. In utero iron deficiency (ID) may delay auditory neural maturation in infants. We evaluated the association between ID and HHL as well as the modification effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on this association in newborns.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - This study compared two methods—auditory brainstem response (ABR) and extracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG)—to evaluate the effectiveness of floating mass transducer (FMT) placement in active middle ear implant (AMEI) surgery for patients with mixed hearing loss.
  • - 15 patients underwent AMEI implantation, and results showed that ABR successfully assessed coupling efficiency in all cases, whereas ECochG was effective in only eight, indicating that ABR is more reliable and robust.
  • - The research concluded that ABR provides more accurate predictions of coupling efficiency and is preferable for optimizing FMT placement during surgery, offering useful data for future clinical applications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Development of an audiological assessment and diagnostic model for high occupational noise exposure.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

June 2023

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

Purpose: To explore the diagnostic auditory indicators of high noise exposure and combine them into a diagnostic model of high noise exposure and possible development of hidden hearing loss (HHL).

Methods: We recruited 101 young adult subjects and divided them according to noise exposure history into high-risk and low-risk groups. All subjects completed demographic characteristic collection (including age, noise exposure, self-reported hearing status, and headset use) and related hearing examination.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!