A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Short-course radiotherapy in stage IV rectal cancer with resectable disease. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Stage IV rectal cancer poses challenges for complete treatment, with surgery and chemotherapy being essential, but the role of pelvic radiotherapy remains unclear.
  • A study initiated in 2009 involved 40 patients, where only 55% underwent successful radical surgery, and overall survival rates at 24 and 36 months were 71.4% and 58.2%, respectively.
  • The findings suggest that a treatment regimen combining chemotherapy, short-course radiotherapy, and surgery can be effective for selected patients, highlighting the potential benefit of pelvic radiotherapy for local disease control.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Stage IV rectal cancer with resectable disease presents challenging issues, as the radical treatment of the whole disease is difficult. Surgery and chemotherapy (CT) play an unquestionable role, but the contribution of pelvic radiotherapy (RT) is not very clear.

Methods: In 2009, we established a prospective treatment protocol that included CT, short-course preoperative radiotherapy (SCRT) with surgery of the primary tumour and all metastatic locations.

Results: Forty patients were included. Eight (20%) patients did not receive CT due to significant comorbidities. Radical surgery treatment was possible in 22 (55%) patients. The mean follow-up was 42.81 months (3.63-105.97). Overall survival at 24 and 36 months was 71.4% and 58.2%, respectively. There was good local control of the disease, as 97.2% of pelvic surgeries were R0 and there were no local recurrences.

Conclusion: In stage IV with resectable metastatic disease, the proposed therapeutic regimen seems very appropriate in well selected patients able to tolerate the treatment. We bet on the role of pelvic RT, due to the good local control of the disease in our series.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-021-02647-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stage rectal
8
rectal cancer
8
cancer resectable
8
resectable disease
8
good local
8
local control
8
control disease
8
disease
6
short-course radiotherapy
4
radiotherapy stage
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!