[Gross hematuria and usefulness of urinary cytology: Experience at hematuria one stop clinic.].

Objective: To report the diagnostic accuracy and liability of the instrumentalized urine cytology in the preliminary study of monosyntomatic gross haematuria.

Methods: A retrospective, descriptive and analytic study of the patients that complained of macroscopic hematuria at the one-stop clinic between 2011 and 2018. The complementary tests requested were: kidney/bladder ultrasounds, urethrocystoscopy and urinary instrumentalized cytology. All the urine cytology samples were examined by the same pathologist.

Results: 1122 patients were reviewed with ultrasonography and cystoscopy. Bladder tumor was detected in 354 patients (31.5%) and other urological malignancies were found in 33 cases (2.9%). Urinary instrumentalized cytologies were collected in 804 patients (71.4%), being positive in 236 cases (29.4%). Sensitivity and specificity of urinary cytology for urothelial tumor detection were 55.1% and 85.7%, respectively. Cytology was positive in 181 patients (52.1%) with visible bladder tumors through cystoscopy, in 7 patients (0.87%) without visible bladder tumors. In 433 patients with ultrasonography and cystoscopy both negative, urine cytology was performed with a negative result (38.6%).

Conclusion: The usefulness of instrumentalized urinary cytology to diagnose urothelial tumors is restricted in terms of monosymptomatic gross haematuria one stop clinic. It allows the diagnosis of a very limited number of cases tumors and leaves a significant number of them out. In case of gross hematuria and negative imaging, urine cytology can be requested as a differed complementary.