Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a known cause of morbidity and mortality, especially among acutely ill medical patients. Although VTE prophylaxis is part of post-discharge clinical care in surgical patients, there is controversy regarding its use in acutely ill medical patients and the current guideline statements suggest against its routine use. Recent clinical trials (APEX, MAGELLAN and MARINER) compared the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (including betrixaban and rivaroxaban) with the standard of the care, enoxaparin, to identify the risk-benefit tradeoff. In this review, we summarized the key findings from these trials and substudies and recent updates in society guidelines regarding VTE prevention. In addition, we discussed the potential barriers, cost-effectiveness, and COVID-19 with respect to the implementation of extended-duration or post-discharge usage of direct oral anticoagulants.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8165214PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S271439DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

direct oral
12
oral anticoagulants
12
venous thromboembolism
8
acutely ill
8
ill medical
8
medical patients
8
current opinion
4
opinion direct
4
anticoagulants prophylaxis
4
prophylaxis venous
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!