AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assessed the implementation of family involvement guidelines for individuals with psychotic disorders in 15 community mental health centers in Norway, highlighting the importance of family support as backed by scientific and ethical standards.
  • The researchers utilized three fidelity scales to measure various aspects of family involvement, scoring practices from 1 to 5 to determine their extent of implementation.
  • Results revealed a low mean score of 2.33 for basic family involvement practices, with only 4% of patients receiving family psychoeducation, indicating significant room for improvement in adherence to guidelines.

Article Abstract

Background: Family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders is supported by scientific evidence, as well as legal and ethical considerations, and recommended in clinical practice guidelines. This article reports a cross-sectional measurement of the level of implementation of such guidelines in fifteen community mental health centre units in Norway, and presents a novel fidelity scale to measure basic family involvement and support. The aim was to investigate current family involvement practices comprehensively, as a basis for targeted quality improvement.

Methods: We employed three fidelity scales, with 12-14 items, to measure family involvement practices. Items were scored from 1 to 5, where 1 equals no implementation and 5 equals full implementation. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics, a non-parametric test, and calculation of interrater reliability for the scales.

Results: The mean score was 2.33 on the fidelity scale measuring basic family involvement and support. Among patients with psychotic disorders, only 4% had received family psychoeducation. On the family psychoeducation fidelity assessment scale, measuring practice and content, the mean score was 2.78. Among the eight units who offered family psychoeducation, it was 4.34. On the general organizational index scale, measuring the organisation and implementation of family psychoeducation, the mean score was 1.78. Among the units who offered family psychoeducation, it was 2.46. As a measure of interrater reliability, the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.99 for the basic family involvement and support scale, 0.93 for the family psychoeducation fidelity assessment scale and 0.96 for the general organizational index scale.

Conclusions: The implementation level of the national guidelines on family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders was generally poor. The quality of family psychoeducation was high, but few patients had received this evidence-based treatment. Our novel fidelity scale shows promising psychometric properties and may prove a useful tool to improve the quality of health services. There is a need to increase the implementation of family involvement practices in Norway, to reach a larger percentage of patients and relatives.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03869177 . Registered 11.03.19.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8170939PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03300-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

family involvement
36
family psychoeducation
28
family
16
involvement practices
16
psychotic disorders
16
persons psychotic
12
fidelity scale
12
basic family
12
involvement support
12
scale measuring
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!