Conventional cell-counting software uses contour or watershed segmentations and focuses on identifying two-dimensional (2D) cells attached on the bottom of plastic plates. Recently developed software has been useful tools for the quality control of 2D cell-based assays by measuring initial seed cell numbers. These algorithms do not, however, quantitatively test in three-dimensional (3D) cell-based assays using extracellular matrix (ECM), because cells are aggregated and overlapped in the 3D structure of the ECM such as Matrigel, collagen, and alginate. Such overlapped and aggregated cells make it difficult to segment cells and to count the number of cells accurately. It is important, however, to determine the number of cells to standardize experiments and ensure the reproducibility of 3D cell-based assays. In this study, we apply a 3D cell-counting method using U-net deep learning to high-density aggregated cells in ECM to identify initial seed cell numbers. The proposed method showed a 10% counting error in high-density aggregated cells, while the contour and watershed segmentations showed 30% and 40% counting errors, respectively. Thus, the proposed method can reduce the seed cell-counting error in 3D cell-based assays by providing the exact number of cells to researchers, thereby enabling the acquisition of quality control in 3D cell-based assays.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24726303211017532DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cell-based assays
24
quality control
12
control cell-based
12
seed cell
12
aggregated cells
12
number cells
12
cells
9
contour watershed
8
watershed segmentations
8
initial seed
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!