Healthcare professionals are considered to be at high risk of exposure and spread of SARS-CoV-2, and have therefore been considered a priority group in COVID-19 vaccination campaign strategies. However, it must be assumed that the immune response is influenced by numerous factors, including sex and gender. The analysis of these factors is an impact element for stratifying the population and targeting the vaccination strategy. Therefore, a large cohort of healthcare workers participating in the Italian vaccination campaign against SARS-CoV-2 has been studied to establish the impact of sex and gender on vaccination coverage using the Gender Impact Assessment approach. This study shows a significant difference in the antibody titers among different age and sex groups, with a clear decreasing trend in antibody titers in the older age groups. Overall, the serological values were significantly higher in females; the reported side effects are more frequent in females than in males. Therefore, disaggregated data point out how the evaluation of gender factors could be essential in COVID-19 vaccination strategies. On this biomedical and social basis, suggestions are provided to improve the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaign in healthcare professionals. Still, they could be adapted to other categories and contexts.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8158485 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9050522 | DOI Listing |
Hum Vaccin Immunother
December 2025
Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
In April 2024, the Adult Immunization Board convened a technical meeting to explore the latest strategies and identify exemplary approaches regarding the implementation of vaccines for adults into Europe's National Immunization Programs (NIPs). The meeting was built around three pillars: decision making for introducing a new vaccine, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. The increasing number of new vaccines available in a context of competing health priorities warrants transparent and evidence-based decision-making processes for vaccine introduction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Public Health
January 2025
Changzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 203 Taishan Road, Xinbei District, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province, 213000, China.
Background: The benefits of improving coverage and timeliness of varicella vaccination need to be quantified in countries where varicella vaccine (VarV) has not yet been included in national immunization programs. This longitudinal study analyzed the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the varicella vaccination program implemented in Changzhou City during the transitional period (2017-2022).
Methods: Using the Immunization Information System and National Notifiable Infectious Disease Surveillance System registry data, this retrospective case-cohort study assessed the VEs of varicella vaccination for Changzhou children born from 2016 to 2021.
PLOS Glob Public Health
January 2025
CEPED, IRD-Université de Paris, ERL INSERM SAGESUD, Paris, France.
Bangladesh completed a primary series of COVID-19 vaccinations for about 86 individuals per 100 population as of 5 July 2023. However, ensuring higher coverage in vulnerable areas is challenging. We report on the COVID-19 vaccine uptake and associated factors among adults in two vulnerable areas in Bangladesh.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Open
January 2025
International Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Objective: Despite the Global Vaccine Action Plan's goal of at least 90% vaccine coverage for all children, Uganda has made limited progress in vaccination over the past decade. The objective of this study was to examine the subnational trends in the prevalence and inequalities in under-immunisation and zero-dose among children aged 12-23 months in Uganda.
Study Design: A retrospective national cross-sectional study.
BMC Public Health
January 2025
School of Economics, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Background: In African Regional Economic Communities (RECs), notable and enduring disparities exist in health outcomes. This study investigates the impact of macro-level characteristics of countries on health outcomes disparities within the African Regional Economic groupings. The study used panel data from the World Bank Development Indicators (WDI) and the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI), spanning 37 African countries, grouped into eight RECs between 2000 and 2019.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!