This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a novel chest compression (CC) smart-ring-based feedback system in a manikin simulation. In this randomized, crossover, controlled study, we evaluated the effect of smart-ring CC feedback on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The learnability and usability of the tool were evaluated with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Participants were divided into two groups and each performed CCs with and without feedback 2 weeks apart, using different orders. The primary outcome was compression depth; the proportion of accurate-depth (5-6 cm) CCs, CC rate, and the proportion of complete CCs (≤1 cm of residual leaning) were assessed additionally. The feedback group and the non-feedback group showed significant differences in compression depth (52.1 (46.3-54.8) vs. 47.1 (40.5-49.9) mm, = 0.021). The proportion of accurate-depth CCs was significantly higher in the interventional than in the control condition (88.7 (30.0-99.1) vs. 22.6 (0.0-58.5%), = 0.033). The mean SUS score was 83.9 ± 8.7 points. The acceptability ranges were 'acceptable', and the adjective rating was 'excellent'. CCs with smart-ring feedback could help achieve the ideal range of depth during CPR. The smart-ring may be a valuable source of CPR feedback.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8158714PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105408DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

smart-ring-based feedback
8
feedback system
8
smart-ring feedback
8
compression depth
8
proportion accurate-depth
8
feedback
7
ccs
5
impact smart-ring-based
4
system quality
4
quality chest
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!