Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone.

Sensors (Basel)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, 223 63 Lund, Sweden.

Published: May 2021

Most commercial prosthetic hands lack closed-loop feedback, thus, a lot of research has been focusing on implementing sensory feedback systems to provide the user with sensory information during activities of daily living. This study evaluates the possibilities of using a microphone and electrotactile feedback to identify different textures. A condenser microphone was used as a sensor to detect the friction sound generated from the contact between different textures and the microphone. The generated signal was processed to provide a characteristic electrical stimulation presented to the participants. The main goal of the processing was to derive a continuous and intuitive transfer function between the microphone signal and stimulation frequency. Twelve able-bodied volunteers participated in the study, in which they were asked to identify the stroked texture (among four used in this study: Felt, sponge, silicone rubber, and string mesh) using only electrotactile feedback. The experiments were done in three phases: (1) Training, (2) with-feedback, (3) without-feedback. Each texture was stroked 20 times each during all three phases. The results show that the participants were able to differentiate between different textures, with a median accuracy of 85%, by using only electrotactile feedback with the stimulation frequency being the only variable parameter.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8152043PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21103384DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

electrotactile feedback
16
textures microphone
8
stimulation frequency
8
three phases
8
microphone
5
feedback
5
electrotactile
4
feedback discrimination
4
discrimination surface
4
textures
4

Similar Publications

Oscillatory cortico-cortical connectivity during tactile discrimination between dynamic and static stimulation.

Cereb Cortex

September 2024

Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Weijin Road Nankai District, Tianjin, China.

Article Synopsis
  • - The study focuses on how the brain distinguishes between dynamic (moving) and static (still) tactile signals using EEG recordings, aiming to enhance understanding of sensory perception.
  • - Results showed significant differences in average event-related potentials for static and dynamic conditions at specific time intervals, with key brain areas activated such as the superior parietal cortex and primary motor cortex.
  • - Analysis identified three distinct brain networks involved in tactile processing: a discrimination network, a feedback network, and a motor loop, highlighting the complex interplay between different brain regions when processing tactile information.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study evaluates a new electrotactile interface designed to enhance interaction with a Supernumerary Robotic Limb (SRL) by providing 3D spatial information through feedback on the user's thigh.
  • Psychometric tests showed that participants successfully distinguished between electrode pads with an average success rate of 62.7% in static conditions, which improved to 88.1% during dynamic target-reaching tasks.
  • The interface demonstrated high-resolution spatial information transmission with an overall success rate of 78.8% in mixed spatial and frequency modulation tasks, indicating potential applications in tactile-based navigation and control systems.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study investigates the feasibility of a novel brain-computer interface (BCI) device designed for sensory training following stroke. The BCI system administers electrotactile stimuli to the user's forearm, mirroring classical sensory training interventions. Concurrently, selective attention tasks are employed to modulate electrophysiological brain responses (somatosensory event-related potentials-sERPs), reflecting cortical excitability in related sensorimotor areas.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Integrating haptic feedback in virtual and augmented reality improves user experiences, but traditional electrotactile systems struggle with inconsistent results due to varying touch pressure.
  • This study introduces a transparent electrotactile screen using pressure-sensitive transistors to ensure stable haptic sensations by calibrating variations caused by different touch pressures.
  • The system also explores remote tactile stimulation through electromagnetic wave interference, enabling versatile feedback patterns like Morse code and Braille, enhancing immersion and accessibility through portable smart devices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Restoring tactile feedback in virtual reality can improve user experience and facilitate the feeling of embodiment. Electrotactile stimulation can be an attractive technology in this context as it is compact and allows for high-resolution spatially distributed stimulation. In the present study, a 32-channel tactile glove worn on the fingertips was used to provide tactile sensations during a virtual version of a rubber hand illusion experiment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!