Purpose This study aimed to describe and compare the performance of two screening protocols used for preschool hearing screening in resource-constrained settings. Method Secondary data analysis was done to determine the performance of two protocols implemented during a preschool hearing screening program using mobile health technology in South Africa. Pure-tone audiometry screening at 25 dB HL for 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz in each ear was used by both protocols. The fail criterion for the first protocol (2,147 children screened) constituted a no-response on one or more frequencies in either ear. The second protocol required two or more no-responses (5,782 children). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to investigate associations between outcomes and protocol, age, gender, and duration. Results Fail rates for the one-frequency fail protocol was 8.7% ( = 186) and 4.3% ( = 250) for the two-frequency fail protocol. Children screened with the two-frequency fail protocol were 52.9% less likely to fail ( < .001; = 0.471; 95% confidence interval [0.385, 0.575]). Gender ( = .251) and age ( = .570) had no significant effect on screening outcome. A percentage of cases screened (44.7%) exceeded permissible noise levels in at least one ear at 1000 Hz across both protocols. True- and false-positive cases did not differ significantly between protocols. Protocol type ( = .204), gender ( = .314), and age ( = .982) did not affect the odds of being a true-positive result. Average screening time was 72.8 s (78.66 ) and 64.9 s (55.78 ) for the one-frequency and two-frequency fail protocols, respectively. Conclusions A two-frequency fail criterion and immediate rescreen of failed frequencies significantly reduced referral rate for follow-up services that are often overburdened in resourced-constrained settings. Future protocol adaptations can also consider increasing the screening levels at 1000 Hz to minimize the influence of environmental noise.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

two-frequency fail
16
preschool hearing
12
hearing screening
12
fail protocol
12
screening
8
screening resource-constrained
8
resource-constrained settings
8
fail
8
fail criterion
8
protocol
8

Similar Publications

Millimeter wave (mmWave) technologies at 60 GHz and 100 GHz bands are currently gaining significant attention for its potential to meet the demanding needs of next-generation networks. These include ultra-high data rate, ultra-low latency, high spectral efficiency, and high end-to-end reliability. However, mmWave signals' blockage remains a critical issue that affects the reliability of mmWave at 60 GHz and at 100 GHz bands due to the significant attenuations induced by the blockers (BLs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose This study aimed to describe and compare the performance of two screening protocols used for preschool hearing screening in resource-constrained settings. Method Secondary data analysis was done to determine the performance of two protocols implemented during a preschool hearing screening program using mobile health technology in South Africa. Pure-tone audiometry screening at 25 dB HL for 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz in each ear was used by both protocols.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Determinants of temporal lability in ventricular repolarisation are not fully recognised. We aimed to analyse the sources of RT variability by comparing normal subjects and patients after myocardial infarction (MI) with either depressed or preserved left ventricular (LV) function.

Methods: One hundred and nine patients (27 women, 82 men, aged 51 +/- 9 years) were divided into three groups: 24 patients (pts) with an uncomplicated angiographically proven coronary heart disease (CHD-group), 59 post-MI pts with preserved LV function (LVEF > 40%, PMI-N-group) and 26 post-MI pts with depressed LV function (LVEF < 40%, PMI-L-group).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!