Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
A paraganglioma is a tumor originating in the sympathetic or parasympathetic nervous system. Its diagnosis may sometimes be confusing if it occurs in an atypical site. We described herein a case of a peripancreatic paraganglioma originating in the greater omentum. An asymptomatic, 61-year-old, female patient was referred to our hospital for detailed examination of a peripancreatic mass detected incidentally on computed tomography (CT). The differential diagnosis was a neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN), and a biopsy using EUS-FNA was performed. Histologically, the tumor cells showed proliferation in solid cell nests and were positive for CD56, chromogranin A, and synaptophysin. These findings and the hypervascularity of the tumor on imaging studies were compatible with NEN. Since the imaging studies did not clearly demonstrate the continuity of the tumor with the pancreas, laparoscopic tumor resection without a pancreatectomy and sampling of the enlarged peripancreatic lymph nodes were planned as treatment. The absence of continuity with the pancreas was later confirmed by intraoperative observation, and the resection was carried out as planned. The resected tumor was pathologically considered as NEN at first in agreement with the preoperative diagnosis. However, several histological findings (such as a zelleballen-like growth pattern, pseudo-inclusion, and strong nuclear atypia compared with the cells' proliferative ability) were atypical for NEN, and paraganglioma was included in the differential diagnosis. Additional immunostainings of S-100 and AE1/AE3 were performed, leading to the final diagnosis of paraganglioma. Paragangliomas should be included in the differential diagnosis of an intraperitoneal mass of uncertain identity with hypervascularity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12328-021-01452-0 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!