A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Low Subjective Wellbeing Is Associated with Psychological Distress in People Living with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. | LitMetric

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a common and debilitating disease of the gastrointestinal tract. Psychological distress is highly comorbid to IBD, especially during periods of active disease. However, a controversy exists on how to best manage its symptoms in the IBD population.

Aims: This study aimed to explore protective and risk factors of psychological distress in IBD.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted via social media and online patient forums. Respondents (N = 235) filled out questionnaires on demographics, health characteristics and a range of psychological variables. Measures of pain, disease activity, comorbid functional symptom severity, social support, subjective wellbeing, sleep quality, fatigue, stress, age, BMI and gender were entered into the Classification and Regression Tree Analysis model.

Results: Overall, 87 participants (37%) reported distress. Self-reported stress significantly discriminated between cases of probable psychological distress. In those with high stress, patients with and without probable psychological distress were separated by subjective wellbeing. Among patients with low stress, fatigue was the primary discriminator.

Conclusions: Monitoring patients for low subjective wellbeing and high stress in clinical settings could offer an opportunity to engage in early intervention to limit psychological distress development. Monitoring for fatigue in patients who seem otherwise psychologically well could offer preventative benefits.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07065-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

psychological distress
24
subjective wellbeing
16
low subjective
8
inflammatory bowel
8
bowel disease
8
probable psychological
8
high stress
8
patients low
8
psychological
7
distress
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!