Antihistamine premedication improves safety and efficacy of allergen immunotherapy.

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Department of Allergy, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China. Electronic address:

Published: September 2021

Background: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT)-associated adverse events are a major concern for safety and efficacy of AIT. Presently, there is no consensus to whether antihistamine premedication could improve such conditions.

Objective: To identify the superiority of antihistamine pretreatment in AIT.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search for randomized controlled trials reporting the effects of antihistamine premedication on safety and efficacy of AIT was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Safety was evaluated according to the number of patients reporting systemic adverse reactions (SARs, the primary outcome) and efficacy according to the number of patients achieving target maintenance dose (TMD) and sustained unresponsiveness to allergen.

Results: A total of 11 randomized controlled trials (including 609 patients) satisfied the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. All premedication protocols were temporary. Pooled analysis revealed that compared with control patients, significantly fewer antihistamine-pretreated patients reported total and moderate-to-severe SARs (odds ratio [OR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.56; P < .05 and OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.74; P < .05, respectively) and total and moderate-to-severe SAR episodes (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.34-0.53; P < .05 and OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.50; P < .05, respectively). Similarly, antihistamine pretreatment significantly increased the number of patients achieving TMD (OR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.72-5.03; P < .05), but not sustained unresponsiveness (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 0.77-3.54; P = 0.2), compared with the control group. Subgroup analysis according to different allergens and dose-escalating approaches also displayed superiority of antihistamine pretreatment than control.

Conclusion: Antihistamine premedication can markedly improve safety and efficacy of AIT by reducing frequency and severity of SAR and increasing TMD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2021.05.023DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

antihistamine premedication
16
safety efficacy
16
efficacy ait
12
antihistamine pretreatment
12
number patients
12
allergen immunotherapy
8
superiority antihistamine
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled trials
8
patients achieving
8

Similar Publications

: Postoperative pneumonia and complications significantly impact outcomes in thoracic surgery, particularly for patients undergoing lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study evaluates whether preoperative premedication influences the risk of postoperative pneumonia and overall complications. : This retrospective study included 346 patients who underwent lobectomy for NSCLC at the University Hospital Ostrava between 2015 and 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of premedication protocols in preventing immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to taxane chemotherapy by comparing protocols that omit H2 antagonists with those that include famotidine.

Methods: This was an open-label, single-center, randomized clinical trial. Randomization was 1:1 to two groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Preparing Nurses for CD20-CD3 Bispecific Antibody Treatment in Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Scoping Review of Adverse Events and Management Strategies From Early Phase and Pivotal Trials.

Cancer Nurs

December 2024

Author Affiliations: Parkville Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (Mss van der Linde and Robertson, Messrs Minson and Dickinson, and Dr Krishnasamy); Barwon Health, University Hospital Geelong (Ms Knights); Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville (Dr Krishnasamy); and Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Alliance (Dr Krishnasamy); and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne (Dr Krishnasamy), Australia.

Background: Bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies (BsAbs) are novel agents used to treat B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL); these agents demonstrate a different toxicity profile compared with standard chemoimmunotherapy.

Objective: To describe common adverse events (AEs) experienced by patients with B-NHL during BsAb treatment.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMCARE, and EMBASE were searched for relevant studies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

ICOSLG Is Associated with Anti-PD-1 and Concomitant Antihistamine Treatment Response in Advanced Melanoma.

Int J Mol Sci

November 2024

Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131 Naples, Italy.

We previously demonstrated that patients with metastatic unresectable stage IIIb-IV melanoma receiving cetirizine (a second-generation H1 antagonist antihistamine) premedication with immunotherapy had better outcomes than those not receiving cetirizine. In this retrospective study, we searched for a gene signature potentially predictive of the response to the addition of cetirizine to checkpoint inhibition (nivolumab or pembrolizumab with or without previous ipilimumab). Transcriptomic analysis showed that inducible T cell costimulator ligand (ICOSLG) expression directly correlated with the disease control rate (DCR) when detected with a loading value > 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Optimizing Premedication Strategies for Iodinated Contrast Media in CT scans: A Literature Review.

J Med Imaging Radiat Sci

January 2025

Department of Radiation Oncology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, The University of Toronto, Canada. Electronic address:

Background: Computed tomography (CT) has revolutionized medical imaging, enabling cross-sectional evaluation of the human body. The increasing utilization of iodinated contrast media (ICM) in contrast-enhanced CT scans has raised concerns about potential adverse reactions. This literature review investigates the efficacy of premedication regimens in preventing severe allergic reactions to intravenous ICM.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!