Purpose: To analyze the effect of patient age, sex, and associated preoperative factors on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and graft survival following primary meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT).
Methods: A prospectively collected database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent primary MAT with a minimum of 2 years of follow up between 1999 and 2017. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative outcome data were collected for each patient. Postoperative outcomes were stratified based on age and sex, and comparative statistical analysis was performed between sexes, both >40 and <40.
Results: A total of 238 patients underwent primary MAT during the study period, of which 212 patients (mean age, 28.5 ± 9.0 years; range, 15.01-53.67 years) met the inclusion criteria with a mean follow-up of 5.1 ± 3.4 years (range 2.0-15.9 years). At final follow-up, patients ≥40 and <40 years of age demonstrated statistically significant improvements in nearly all PRO scores (P < .05 for both groups). There were no significant differences between either group for achievement of minimal clinically important difference for International Knee Documentation Committee (P = .48) or Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score symptoms (P = .76). Because of insufficient numbers, a statistically significant difference could not be demonstrated in reoperation rate (≥40: 1.49 ± 1.77 years, <40: 1.87 ± 1.98 years, P = .591), failure rate (≥40: 7/32 [21.9%], <40: 19/180 [10.6%], P = .072), or complication rate (≥40: 2/32 [6.3%], <40: 12/180 [6.7%], P = .930) based on age. Both sexes showed a significant improvement in PROs, whereas female patients were more likely to undergo revision surgery (P = .033), with no significant differences based on time to reoperation, failure, or complication rates.
Conclusions: PROs similarly improved following MAT in both patients aged ≥40 and those <40 at final follow-up with no significant differences in minimal clinically important difference achievement rate, complication rate, reoperation rate, time to reoperation, or failure rate between groups. Female patients may be more likely to undergo revision surgery after MAT.
Level Of Evidence: III; therapeutic retrospective comparison study.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.05.029 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Article Synopsis
- Meniscal extrusion (ME) is a significant predictor of knee joint degeneration, but existing classifications primarily use numerical assessments without considering the underlying causes of ME.
- Evidence suggests that ME can arise from various conditions, including acute tears, chronic degeneration, and even joint loading or anatomical issues that are not necessarily indicative of pathology.
- A new qualitative classification is proposed to categorize ME into paraphysiological, pathological, and degenerative types, with an emphasis on adapting clinical management based on these distinct categories.
Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction With Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction: A Matched-Cohort Study.
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
Memorial Hermann Rockets Sports Medicine Institute, Department of Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Houston, Texas, USA.
Background: Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) is indicated in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to restore proper arthrokinematics and load distribution for the meniscus-deficient knee. Objective outcomes after ACL reconstruction with concomitant MAT in athletic populations are scarcely reported and highly variable.
Purpose: To compare patient outcomes using an objective functional performance battery, self-reported outcome measures, and return-to-sport rates between individuals undergoing ACL reconstruction with concomitant MAT and a matched group undergoing isolated ACL reconstruction.
Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Shows Superior Graft Remodeling, Maturation, and Stability Compared With Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Arthroscopy
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, College of Medicine, Chonnam National University, 322, Seoyang-ro, Hwasun, 58128, Republic of Korea. Electronic address:
Purpose: To compare graft remodeling, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and clinical outcomes between patients who underwent isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) versus combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ACLR + ALLR).
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent primary ACLR with quadruple hamstring grafts between January 2019 and March 2022, with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the addition of ALLR with tibialis anterior allografts: an isolated ACLR group and an ACLR + ALLR group.
Superior pain relief and quality of life with autografts using semitendinosus or patellar ligament compared to allografts in meniscal reconstruction: A 2-year prospective comparative study.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
December 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, APHM, Institute for Locomotion, Sainte-Marguerite Hospital, Marseille, France.
Purpose: This study aims to compare the 2-year clinical outcomes of meniscal reconstructions using allograft versus autograft tissue, with a focus on patient-reported outcomes, complication rates and surgical revision rates.
Methods: This prospective comparative cohort study included 60 patients (ages 18-60 years) undergoing meniscal reconstruction. Patients were divided into an allograft group (n = 31) and an autograft group (n = 29; Hamstring tendon = 25 and patellar tendons = 4).
Knee osteotomy combined with meniscal allograft transplantation versus knee osteotomy alone in patients with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis: a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial protocol.
BMJ Open
December 2024
Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Introduction: Knee osteotomy combined with meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) showed promising results to treat unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) secondary to meniscal deficiency and knee malalignment. However, there is still no high-level evidence to demonstrate whether the combination of these two treatments is superior to osteotomy alone.
Methods And Analysis: 52 patients with unicompartmental knee OA Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≤3 secondary to meniscal deficiency and knee malalignment (aged 20-60 years) are randomised to undergo knee osteotomy associated with MAT or knee osteotomy alone in a 1:1 ratio.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!