Layering of discolored substrates with high-value opaque composites for CAD-CAM monolithic ceramics.

J Prosthet Dent

Professor, MSciD Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Meridional Faculty, IMED, Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Electronic address:

Published: July 2021

Statement Of Problem: Severely discolored substrates have been shown to limit the use of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) ceramic blocks because they provide insufficient color masking.

Purpose: The purpose of the in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of a layer of high-value opaque composite resin over discolored substrates to determine its masking ability with CAD-CAM ceramics.

Material And Methods: Six ceramic groups (n=10) were tested. A bilayer group of zirconia and porcelain served as the control. The CAD-CAM monolithic groups were translucent zirconia, zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate, lithium disilicate, leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic, and feldspathic ceramic. Five substrates were used: A1 (used as reference), A3.5, C4, and coppery and silvery metals. The substrates were separated as nonlayered or layered (with flowable or restorative opaque composite resins). The tested luting agents were white, opaque, and A1. Color differences (ΔE) were assessed with the CIEDE2000 formula. A 2-way ANOVA (α=.05) was used to detect significant differences in ΔE among the groups for each substrate. The results were compared with acceptability (1.77) and perceptibility (0.81) thresholds.

Results: The flowable composite resin layer associated with A1 luting agent ensured ΔE lesser the than perceptibility thresholdwith the use of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramics, with the lowest values for zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate in substrates A3.5 (0.53) and C4 (0.32) and for leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic for coppery (0.49) and silvery (0.81) substrates (P<.001). The same benefit was observed when zirconia and porcelain was tested over the silvery substrate. The absence of substrate treatment only provided ΔE lesser than the acceptability threshold with CAD-CAM ceramics for the A3.5 background.

Conclusions: The application of a flowable opaque composite resin and the use of a shaded luting agent ensure masking with CAD-CAM monolithic ceramics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

discolored substrates
12
cad-cam monolithic
12
high-value opaque
8
monolithic ceramics
8
opaque composite
8
composite resin
8
zirconia-reinforced lithium
8
lithium silicate
8
leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic
8
differences Δe
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!